The Lay of the Land

Evaluation Practice in Canada Today

Authors

  • Benoît Gauthier Réseau Circum Inc., Gatineau, Québec
  • Gail Barrington Barrington Research Group, Inc., Calgary, Alberta
  • Sandra L. Bozzo Ontario Ministry of Community Family and Children’s Services Toronto, Ontario
  • Kaireen Chaytor Chaytor Consulting Services Ltd., Halifax, Nova Scotia
  • Jim Cullen Ministère de l’Éducation du Québec, Montréal, Québec
  • Robert Lahey Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, Ottawa, Ontario
  • Robert Malatest R.A. Malatest and Associates Ltd., Victoria, British Columbia
  • Greg Mason Prairie Research Associates Ltd., Winnipeg, Manitoba
  • John Mayne Office of the Auditor General of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
  • Anita Myers University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario
  • Nancy L. Porteous Health Canada, Ottawa, Ontario
  • Simon Roy GGI inc., Ottawa, Ontario

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.019.006

Abstract

A group of 12 evaluation practitioners and observers takes stock of the state of program evaluation in Canada. Each of the contributors provides a personal viewpoint, based on their own experience in the field. The selection of contributors constitutes a purposive sample aimed at providing depth of view and a variety of perspectives. Each presentation highlights one strength of program evaluation practiced in Canada, one weakness, one threat, and one opportunity. It is concluded that evaluators possess skills that other professions do not offer; they are social and economic researchers versed in using empirical data collection and analysis methods to provide a strong factual foundation for program and policy assessment. However, program evaluation has not acquired an identity of its own and, in fact, has tended to neglect key evaluation issues and to lose emphasis on rigour. Today’s program evaluation environment is dominated by program monitoring, the lack of program evaluation self-identity, and insufficient connection with management needs. But evaluation is not without opportunities — results-based and outcome-based management, advocacy and partnership efforts, individual training and development, and bridging between program management and policy development represent some. But first, evaluators must self-define to communicate to others what their specific contribution is likely to be. The article concludes with implications for the practice of evaluation in Canada and the blueprint of a work-plan for evaluators individually and collectively, in their organizations and in their professional association.

Downloads

Published

2004-04-21

How to Cite

Gauthier, B., Barrington, G., Bozzo, S. L., Chaytor, K., Cullen, J., Lahey, R., … Roy, S. (2004). The Lay of the Land: Evaluation Practice in Canada Today. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 19(1), 143–178. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.019.006

Issue

Section

Research and Practice Notes

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 4 5 > >>