Arts-Based Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2023-0024Keywords:
arts-based approaches, arts-based evaluation, visual arts, quilting, community developmentAbstract
Arts-based evaluation is an effective way to engage people and uncover meaningful, valid results. In the project that was used to inform this article, an arts-based approach was used to gain an understanding of the effects the Communities ChooseWell Program has had according to the Champions’ experiences. Communities ChooseWell is an Alberta Recreation and Parks Association Program that promotes healthy eating and active living in communities across Alberta. The evaluation was completed using an arts-based approach which allowed us to explore varied long-term effects in different contexts. The arts used within this project include painting, writing narratives, and quilting. This article will present some reflections and recommendations that could inform evaluators that are interested in using arts-based approaches. This article starts with information from relevant literature about arts-based approaches to evaluation followed by what was learned throughout the ChooseWell arts-based evaluation and recommendations for evaluators when planning an arts-based evaluation.
References
Ashworth, J. (2020). Art-ful methods of democratic participation: Listening, engagement, and connection. In L. Levar & S. Wiebe (Eds.), Creating spaces of engagement (pp. 208–225). Toronto, ON: University of Toronto Press.
Ball, H. K. (2012). Quilts. In Handbook of the arts in qualitative research: Perspectives, methodologies, examples, and issues (pp. 364–369). Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications Inc.
Ball, H. K. (2002). Subversive materials: quilts as social text. The Alberta Journal of Educational Research, XLIII(3), 1–29.
Barone, T., & Eisner, E. (2012). Arts based research. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Inc.
Bishop, K., Etmanski, C., & Page, M. B. (2019). Engaged scholarship and the arts. Engaged Scholar Journal, 5(2), i–viii.
Blumenfeld-Jones, D. S. (2016). The artistic process and arts-based research: A phenomenological account of the practice. Qualitative Inquiry, 22(5), 322–333.
Bourdieu, P., & Accardo, A. (1999). The weight of the world: social suffering in contemporary society. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Charlton, M. (n.d.). Art-Based Evaluation 101. Retrieved from http://www.ascevaluation.ca/Documents/Toolkits/GOAL_ArtBasedEvaluation.pdf
Clover, D. (2011). Successes and challenges of feminist arts-based participatory methodologies with homeless/street-involved women in Victoria. Action Research, 9(1), 12–26.
Eales, L., & Peers, D. (2016). Moving adapted physical activity: The possibilities of arts-based research. QUEST, 68(1), 55–68.
Leavy, P. (2020). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice (3rd Ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Lewis, O. (1961). The children of Sanchez: Autobiography of a Mexican family. New York, NY: Random House.
Mertens, D. M., (2018). Variations in mixed methods evaluation designs. In Mixed Methods Design in Evaluation (pp. 133–174). Thousand Oaks, SAGE Publications Inc.
Monk, D., de Oliviera Jayme, B., & Salvi, E. (2019). The heART of activisim: Stories of community engagement. Engaged Scholar Journal, 5(2), 61–78.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). The Nature, niche, value, and fruit of qualitative inquiry. [Chapter 1] In Qualitative research & evaluation methods: integrating theory and practice. 4th Ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications. pp. 2–44. ISBN 9781412972123
Saarnivaara, M. (2003). Art as inquiry: The autopsy of an [Art] experience. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(4), 580–602.
Simons, H., & McCormack, B. (2007). Integrating arts-based inquiry in evaluation methodology opportunities and challenges. Qualitative Inquiry, 13(2), 292–311.
Yanow, D. (2009). Ways of knowing: Passionate humility and reflective practice in research and management. The American Review of Public Administration, 19(6), 579–601.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Karyn Hurlbut, Astrid Brouselle
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
