Answering the Why Question in Evaluation
The Causal-Model Approach
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.015.001Abstract
Theorists and researchers have urged that evaluation test the causal assumptions about why an intervention should work to achieve its goals. Though the terminology is different, these writers agree that the assumed pathway from program to ultimate outcome be made explicit and tested empirically. The causal-model approach, because it is geared toward providing evidence on why a program worked or failed, is advocated whenever time, money, and experience permit. After defining casual-model evaluation, an example from the crime prevention literature is used to contrast the approach with traditional evaluations. Benefits, limitations, and other issues are also discussed.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2000 Anthony Petrosino

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.





