Linking Users’ Views with Utilization Processes in the Evaluation of Interactive Software
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.014.007Abstract
Taking users’ viewpoints into account in evaluation is increasingly recommended. The rationale and methods of user-oriented approaches have been described in theoretical papers. Less often reported are critical and empirical observations on how evaluators should interpret users’ views. In the case of information technology, users’ views may be gathered for the purpose of both evaluation and development. This double function is best served when a theory-driven framework clarifies the processes underlying the utilization of technology. This article delves into empirical results stemming from an evaluation of an interactive software designed to support health promotion planning. The authors contend that users’ viewpoints should be exploited in a meaningful manner, one that goes beyond a summation of the pros and cons and that explains why and how users make use of technology.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1999 P. Lehoux, L. Potvin, M. Proulx

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.





