Perspectives épistémologiques et cadre conceptuel pour l’évaluation de l’implantation d’une action concertée

Authors

  • Martine Cinq-Mars
  • Daniel Fortin Daniel Fortin Université du Québec à Montréal Montréal, Québec

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.14.003

Abstract

The current enthusiasm within the health and social services for complex, multi-partner, collaborative interventions has created a need for systematic evaluation. However, given the complexity of both the interventions to be implemented and of the collaborative process itself, the evaluation must be adapted in light of these factors. From an epistemological point of view, the main consideration is to monitor the intervention-building process with the concerned parties. From a conceptual point of view, four types of issues emerge: the nature of the collaborative action, its developmental process, its characteristics, and the changes it brings about. Finally, it is argued that the participative approach is most appropriate for this type of study.

Published

1999-09-01

How to Cite

Cinq-Mars, M., & Fortin, D. (1999). Perspectives épistémologiques et cadre conceptuel pour l’évaluation de l’implantation d’une action concertée. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 14(2), 57–83. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.14.003

Issue

Section

Articles