AI, post-truth, and populism
What are the implications for the field of evaluation?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18357/cjpe.2026.40.1.1209Keywords:
AI, post-truth, populism, evaluation, practiceAbstract
Have you experienced moments when you felt overwhelmed by recent developments in our world? A worldwide pandemic, escalating environmental crises, major geopolitical conflicts, increasing authoritarianism and repression. At the same time, news reports extol the virtues of technological breakthroughs we cannot fully comprehend, like artificial intelligence (AI), quantum computing, and driverless cars. We also hear about new radicalized social and political movements such as truckers blockading the federal parliament in Canada, international rallies against the concept of 15-minute cities, or protests contesting the human rights of persons from LGBTQ+ communities. Social media, a powerful source of information and human connection, has come to perpetuate crises and disinformation, propagating social divisions and cultures of distrust. Our world is changing at a pace that is making it hard to understand and adapt. Some elements that were considered as givens are eroding: the environment, democracy, peace, social relationships, and even representations of the world that we inhabit.
This thematic section is intended to give us pause to explore the implications of three different but interconnected phenomena of our time for evaluation and research on evaluation: AI, post-truth, and populism. First, let's examine what each concept entails.
References
Amodei, D. (2026). The Adolescence of Technology. Confronting and Overcoming the Risks of Powerful AI. https://www.darioamodei.com/essay/the-adolescence-of-technology
Bengio, Y., Clare, S., Prunkl, C., Murray, M., Andriushchenko, M., Bucknall, B., Rismani, S., McGlynn, C., Maslej, N., Bommasani, R., Casper, S., Davidson, T., Douglas, R., Duvenaud, D., Fox, P., Gohar, U., Hadshar, R., Ho, A., Hu, T., …, Wheeler, N. (2026). International AI Safety Report 2026. https://internationalaisafetyreport.org
Brahms, Y. (2020). Philosophy of Post-Truth. Institute for National Security Studies. http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep23537
Brousselle, A. (2024). Post-truth and pathways for evaluators. Evaluation, 30(4), 533-549. https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890241265859 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/13563890241265859
Dussauge-Laguna, M. I. (2022). The promises and perils of populism for democratic policymaking: The case of Mexico. Policy sciences, 55(4), 777-803. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09469-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09469-z
Fischer, F. (2021). Truth and Post-Truth in Public Policy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108854344 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108854344
House, E. R. (2020). Evaluating in a Fragmented Society. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 16(36), 26-36. https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v16i36.653 DOI: https://doi.org/10.56645/jmde.v16i36.653
Jansen, R. S. (2011). Populist mobilization: A new theoretical approach to populism. Sociological Theory, 29(2), 75-96. http://www.jstor.org/stable/23076372 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2011.01388.x
Kenner, R. (Director).(2015). Merchants of Doubt [Film]. Sony Pictures Home Entertainment.
Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. Verso.
Lamb, W. F., Mattioli, G., Levi, S., & Roberts, J. T., Capstick, S., Creutzig, F., Minx, J. C., Müller-Hansen, F., Culhane, T., & Steinberger, J. K. (2020). Discourses of climate delay. Global Sustainability, 3. https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.13
Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2007). Sociologie de l’action publique. Armand Colin. https://doi.org/10.3917/arco.oumes.2018.01 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/arco.oumes.2018.01
Malpas, J. (1992). Retrieving truth: Modernism, post-modernism and the problem of truth. Soundings, 75(2/3), 287-306. https://www.jstor.org/stable/41178577
Manuel, A. (2017). Populism: An Introduction. Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315268392
Martin, D. (2023). A million splinters of light: What is the path to ethical AI. Briefing Paper 4. Atlantik-Bruecke Canada. https://atlantik-bruecke.ca/read-latest-research-1
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post-truth. MIT Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11483.001.0001
Mouffe, C. (2018). For a left populism. Verso.
Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition, 39(4), 541-563. https://www.jstor.org/stable/44483088 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00135.x
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2014). Populism and political leadership. In R. A. W. Rhodes & H. P. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political leadership (pp. 376–388). Oxford University Press. https://doi-org.ezproxy.library.uvic.ca/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653881.013.016
Nestore, M., & Robertson, S. (2021). Introduction to special issue: education and populisms. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 20(2), 81–85. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1948392 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767724.2021.1948392
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2011). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury Publishing.
Poulakidakos, S., Veneti, A., & Frangonikolopoulos, C. (2018). Post-truth, propaganda and the transformation of the spiral of silence. International Journal of Media & Cultural Politics, 14(3), 367–382. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/161511006.pdf DOI: https://doi.org/10.1386/macp.14.3.367_1
Streeck, W. (2017). The return of the repressed. New Left Review, 2(104), 5-18. https://doi.org/10.64590/eej DOI: https://doi.org/10.64590/eej
Urbinati, N. (2019). Political theory of populism. Annual review of political science, 22(1), 111-127. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050317-070753
Waisbord, S. (2018). The elective affinity between post-truth communication and populist politics. Communication Research and Practice, 4(1), 17-34. https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1428928 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/22041451.2018.1428928
Wang, D., Prabhat, S., & Sambasivan, N. (2022). Whose AI dream? In search of the aspiration in data annotation. Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Article 582, 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502121 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3491102.3502121
Weyland, K. (2018). Populism and authoritarianism. In C. de la Torre (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Global Populism (pp. 319-333). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315226446-26
Wodak, R. (2019). Analysing the micropolitics of the populist far right in the ‘post shame’ era. In R. Wodak & P. Bevelander (Eds.), Europe at the crossroads: Confronting populist, nationalist, and global challenges (pp. 63-92). Nordic Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.919494.6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/jj.919494.6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Astrid Brousselle, Peter Milley, Steve Jacob, Jill Chouinard, Jason Hannan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
