A Roadmap for the Future of Evaluation in an Unsettled World

Authors

  • Steve Jacob Département de Science Politique, Université Laval
  • Astrid Brousselle School of Public Administration, University of Victoria https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4237-2518
  • Jason Hannan Department of Rhetoric, Writing, and Communications, University of Winnipeg
  • Peter Milley Faculty of Education, University of Ottawa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5819-8086

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18357/cjpe.2026.40.1.1213

Keywords:

Populism, Post-Truth, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Polarization, Resilience

Abstract

This article concludes the thematic section on evaluation in an unsettled world. The present context in which evaluation is conducted is shaped by several factors, including the rise of populism, the spread of post-truth, and the accelerated development of artificial intelligence (AI). In this environment, mistrust of expertise and scientific knowledge is increasing. To address these challenges, the article identifies five avenues to support the future of evaluation. These include acknowledging the enduring nature of current transformations, cultivating the resilience of the evaluation community, and adapting methodological approaches to increasingly complex and polarized environments. It also emphasizes the need to renew professional competencies, including relational, communicative, and digital skills, to better position evaluation within evolving information environments. Finally, these developments highlight the need for a re-humanization of evaluation practices, reaffirming the importance of judgment and dialogue.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

Jacob, S., Brousselle, A., Hannan, J., & Milley, P. (2026). A Roadmap for the Future of Evaluation in an Unsettled World. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 40(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.18357/cjpe.2026.40.1.1213

Issue

Section

Thematic Segment

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>