Tekaria’karéhton (it’s been thought out)

Centering Kanien’kehá:ka concepts in Health Promotion Evaluation

Authors

  • Brittany McBeath https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8734-6423
  • Colin P. T. Baillie School of Kinesiology and Health Studies, Queen's University, Kingston, ON
  • Connie Lazore Akwesasne, Ontario
  • Niiostosera:ah Thompson Small Feather Empire, Akwesasne, Ontario
  • Dave Bergeron Département des sciences de la santé, Université du Québec à Rimouski, Rimouski, QC https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8404-665X
  • Brittany Wenniserí:iostha Jock Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, QC https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3321-7463

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18357/cjpe.2026.40.1.1218

Keywords:

Indigenous evaluation, Indigenous health promotion, community-based programs, community-engaged research, process evaluation

Abstract

Evaluation frameworks grounded in Western constructs such as reach, fidelity, and dose delivered/received, do not translate well to the implementation of community-based health promotion in Indigenous settings. There is a pressing need for culturally grounded evaluation approaches that reflect Indigenous values and knowledge systems, and that promote self-determination. This study aimed to identify best practices for health promotion evaluation from the lived experience of one Kanien’kehá:ka community, in order to inform the development of a culturally grounded evaluation framework.

We conducted a community-engaged qualitative research study grounded in Indigenous methodology with the Kanien’kehá:ka community of Akwesasne. Twenty-seven Kitchen Table Talks were held with knowledge carriers, health program staff, and Indigenous scholars. All participants received a tobacco tie and provided informed, verbal consent. Transcripts were analyzed using a thematic approach with participant-identified in vivo Kanien’kéha codes, developed into a codebook applied across all transcripts. Two member-checking Talking Circle sessions were held with interview participants confirming that findings represented the knowledges of individual participants and the wider community.

Participants identified four Kanien’kehá:ka concepts as central to understanding successful health promotion implementation: Skén:nen (Peace), Ka’nikonhrí:io (A Good Mind), Ka’shatsténhsera (Strength/Empowerment), and Konnoronhkwàtshera (Love & Care). These concepts, rooted in the Kaienere’kó:wa (The Great Law of Peace) are also rendered in the form of beadwork by Akwesasró:non artist Niiostosera’ah Thompson.

Collectively, these concepts form the Tekaria’karéhton (it’s been thought out) Framework, which we present as a novel, culturally grounded process evaluation methodology. This framework offers program evaluators a culturally specific alternative to Western notions of program success, advancing evaluation practice for Indigenous and community-engaged health promotion. The Tekaria’karéhton (it’s been thought out) Framework contributes to a growing body of nation-specific Indigenous evaluation methodologies that center community values and self-determined criteria of success.

References

Bonaparte, D. (n.d. -a). Saiowisakeron: The Jake Ice Story. https://www.wampumchronicles.com/saiowisakeron.html

Bonaparte, D. (n.d. -b). The History of Akwesasne from Pre-Contact to Modern Times. https://www.wampumchronicles.com/history.html

Bonaparte, D. (n.d. -c). The History of the St. Regis Catholic Church and the Early Pastors. https://www.wampumchronicles.com/catholicchurch.html

Brown, M. A., & Di Lallo, S. (2020). Talking circles: A culturally responsive evaluation practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 41(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214019899164 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214019899164

Indigenous Services Canada (2025). Evaluation of the urban programming for Indigenous Peoples program. Government of Canada. https://www.isc.gc.ca/eng/1743776373551/1743776420361#sec2

Charmaz, K. (2024). Constructing Grounded Theory (3rd Edition). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://uk.sagepub.com/en-gb/eur/constructing-grounded-theory/book255601

Cram, F. (2018). Conclusion: Lessons about Indigenous evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2018(159), 121–133. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20326 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20326

Johnston-Goodstar, K. (2012). Decolonizing evaluation: The necessity of evaluation advisory groups in indigenous evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2012(136), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20038 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20038

Khudu-Petersen, K., & Chilisa, B. (2019). Diagnosing elements of colonization in Indigenous education: An African effort to research and transform education for Indigenous Peoples. In E. A. McKinley & L. T. Smith (Eds.), Handbook of Indigenous Education (pp. 997–1012). Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3899-0_41 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3899-0_41

LaFrance, J., & Nichols, R. (2009). Indigenous evaluation framework: Telling our story in our place and time. Alexandria (VA): American Indian Higher Education Consortium.

LaFrance, J., Nichols, R., & Kirkhart, K. E. (2012). Culture writes the script: On the centrality of context in indigenous evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2012(135), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20027 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20027

Shepherd, R. P., & Graham, K. A. (2020). Evaluation in Indigenous contexts: An Introduction to practice. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 34(4), 391–399. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.69010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.69010

Iroquois Confederacy of Nations: Hearing on S. Con. Res. 76 before the Select Committee on Indian Affairs, 100th Cong. (1987). https://search.catalog.loc.gov/instances/d4aa7a2a-760e-51c5-888d-d9da6003a5fb?option=lccn&query=88602174

Wilson, S. (2008). Research as ceremony: Indigenous research methods. Fernwood Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-21

How to Cite

McBeath, B., Baillie, C. P. T., Lazore, C., Thompson, N., Bergeron, D., & Jock, B. W. (2026). Tekaria’karéhton (it’s been thought out): Centering Kanien’kehá:ka concepts in Health Promotion Evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 40(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.18357/cjpe.2026.40.1.1218

Issue

Section

Roots and Relations (R&R)