Cultivating a Community of Practice Through Program Evaluation Coursework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18357/cjpe.2026.40.1.14Keywords:
communities of practice, evaluator competencies, evaluator education, practicum, relfective practice, novice evaluatorsAbstract
This Practice Note explores the use of a Communities of Practice (CoP) framework as a tool for designing evaluator education in higher education contexts. Using two graduate-level courses focused on program evaluation, we illustrate how CoP principles—mutual engagement, joint enterprise, and shared repertoire—were implemented to support the development of competencies aligned with the American Evaluation Association (AEA) Evaluator Competencies. Drawing on qualitative data from reflective journals, self-assessments, and focus groups, we highlight how CoP fostered collaborative learning, professional identity formation, and the practical application of skills. While the findings affirm the effectiveness of CoP in bridging theory and practice, they also point to areas for refinement to enhance future evaluator education.
References
American Evaluation Association (2018). 2018 AEA evaluator competencies. https://www.eval.org/p/us/in/
Cho, M., Castleman, A. M., Umans, H., & Mwirigi, M. O. (2023). Measuring evaluator competencies: Developing and validating the evaluator competencies assessment tool. American Journal of Evaluation, 44(3), 474-494. https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211056539 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/10982140211056539
Furco, A., & Billig, S. (2002). Service-learning: the essence of the pedagogy. Information Age Pub.
Ghere, G., King, J. A., Stevahn, L., & Minnema, J. (2006). A Professional Development Unit for Reflecting on Program Evaluator Competencies. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(1), 108-123. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005284974 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005284974
Herbers, M. S., Antelo, A., Ettling, D., & Buck, M. A. (2011). Improving teaching through a community of practice. Journal of Transformative Education, 9(2), 89-108, https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344611430688 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1541344611430688
King, J. A., & Stevahn, L. (2020). Presenting the 2018 AEA evaluator competencies. New Directions for Evaluation, 2020(168), 49-61. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20434 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20435
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice-Hall.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
Lea, M. (2005). 'Communities of practice' in higher education: Useful heuristic or educational model? In: Barton, David and Tusting, Karin eds. Beyond communities of practice: language power and social context. Learning in doing: Social, cognitive and computational perspectives (pp. 180–197). Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511610554.010
Trenholm, S., Peschke, J. (2020). Teaching undergraduate mathematics fully online: a review from the perspective of communities of practice. International Journal of Education Technology in Education, 17(37) https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00215-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00215-0
Viskovic, A. (2006). Becoming a tertiary teacher: learning in communities of practice, Higher Education Research & Development, 25(4), 323-339, https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360600947285 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360600947285
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803932
Wenger, E. C. & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139-146.
Yarbrough, D. B., Shulha, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Caruthers, F. A. (2010). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sandra Ayoo, Ye He

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.


