The Contributions of Innovations in Integration in Complex Mixed Methods Evaluation Designs in This Issue and Beyond
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.73687References
Cook, T. D., & Reichardt, C. S. (1979). Qualitative and quantitative methods in evaluation research. Sage.
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
Fetters, M. D., & Freshwater, D. (2015). The 1 + 1 = 3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115 – 117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815581222
Fetters, M. D., & Guetterman, T. C. (2021). Development of a joint display as a mixed analysis. In A. J. Onwuegbuzie & R. B. Johnson (Eds.), The Routledge reviewer’s guide to mixed methods analysis (pp. 259-275 ). Routledge.
Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., & Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11(3), 255 – 274. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737011003255
Guetterman, T. C., Creswell, J. W., & Kuckartz, U. (2015). Using joint displays and MAXQDA software to represent the results of mixed methods research. In M. McCrudden, G. Schraw, & C. Buckendahl (Eds.), Use of visual displays in research and testing: Coding, interpreting, and reporting data (pp. 145 – 176). Information Age Publishing.
Guetterman, T. C., Fetters, M. D., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays . Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554 – 561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865. Medline:26553895
Guetterman, T. C., Molina-Azorin, J. F., & Fetters, M. D. (2020). Virtual special issue on “integration in mixed methods research.” Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(4), 430 – 435. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689820956401
Guetterman, T. C., & Moss Breen, J. (2021). Addressing the challenge of mixed methods integration through joint displays and clear writing. In A. Factor & J. P. Ulhøi (Eds.), Sustainability and small and medium-sized enterprises (pp. 192 – 208). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429426377
Onwuegbuzie, A. J., & Johnson, R. B. (Eds.). (2021). The Routledge reviewer’s guide to mixed methods analysis. Routledge.
Plano Clark , V. L. , & Sanders , K. (2015). The use of visual displays in mixed methods research . In M. McCrudden, G. Schraw, & C. Buckendahl (Eds.), Use of visual displays in research and testing (pp. 177 – 206). Information Age Publishing.
Yarborough, D. B., Shula, L. M., Hopson, R. K., & Carruthers, F. A. (2011). The program evaluation standards: A guide for evaluators and evaluation users (3rd ed.). Sage.
Younas, A., Pedersen, M., & Durante, A. (2020). Characteristics of joint displays illustrating data integration in mixed‐methods nursing studies. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(2), 676 – 686. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14264. Medline:31713252
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Timothy C. Guetterman

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.





