Evaluation in Transition
The Promise and Challenge of South-South Cooperation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.71630Keywords:
aid, development, development evaluation, Global South, Indigenous, South-South cooperationAbstract
In order for the evaluation field to ensure its salience over the next decade, high-profile areas of work have to be sought where evaluative practices are underexplored or undervalued yet can help inspire and accelerate urgently needed transformations while also advancing evaluation theory and practice. This article highlights one such opportunity, offered by South-South cooperation (SSC), an increasingly powerful force in international development yet overshadowed by the frameworks, narratives, and approaches of North-South cooperation (NSC), better known as international development cooperation or development aid. The values, principles, achievements, and challenges that define SSC are seldom discussed at evaluation events or in the evaluation literature, and development evaluation continues to be shaped largely by theories from the Global North and by North-South interactions, despite the growing prominence of SSC and the Global South in world affairs. This article is dedicated to creating awareness of the current situation by highlighting how more intensive engagement with the unique aspects and underexplored opportunities of SSC might help shift paradigms and practices in evaluation, especially but not only in the Global South.
References
Alston, P. (2020, July 2). The parlous state of poverty eradication. Report A/HRC/44/40 of the UN Special Rapporteur on Extreme Poverty and Human Rights, presented at the Forty-Fourth Session of the Human Rights Council. https://chrgj.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Alston-Poverty-Report-FINAL.pdf
Ang, Y. Y. (2014). Making details matter: How to reform aid agencies to generate contextual knowledge. Winning Entry, GDN Next Horizons Essay Contest: The Future of Development Assistance. Supported by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
Ang, Y. Y. (2016). How China escaped the poverty trap. Cornell University Press.
Besharati, N. (2019). Measuring effectiveness of South - South cooperation. Occasional Paper No. 52. Southern Voice.
Besharati, N., Rawhani, C., & Rios, O. G. (2017). A monitoring and evaluation framework for South-South cooperation. Network of Southern Think-Tanks, Africa Chapter. http://www.saiia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/saia_NeST-Working-Paper_20170515.pdf
Bracho, G. (2017). The troubled relationship of the emerging powers and the effective development cooperation agenda: History, challenges and opportunities. Discussion Paper 25/2017. German Development Institute.
Chaplowe, S., & Hejnowitz, A. (2021). Evaluating outside the box: Evaluation’s transformational potential. Social Innovations Journal, 5. https://socialinnovationsjournal.com/index.php/sij/article/view/704
Chilisa, B., & Mertens, D. (2021). Indigenous Made in Africa Evaluation Frameworks: Addressing Epistemic Violence and Contributing to Social Transformation. American Journal of Evaluation, 42(17). https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1098214020948601
Chouinard, J. A., & Hopson, R. (2016). A critical exploration of culture in international development evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(3), 248 – 276. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.3.02
Constantine, J., Shankland, A., & Gu, J. (2015). Engaging the rising powers in the global partnership for effective development cooperation: A framing paper. Institute of Development Studies.
Cram, F., & Phillips, H. (2012). Claiming interstitial space for multicultural, transdisciplinary research through community-up values. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies, 5(2), 36 – 49. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcis.v5i2.89
Cram, F., Tibbetts, K. A., & LaFrance, J. (Eds.). (2018). New directions for evaluation 159. Wiley Periodicals and the American Evaluation Association.
Dighe, S., & Sarode, T. (2019). Evaluation in the Global South: Practices, problems, and prospects . Reconsidering Development, 6(1). https://pubs.lib.umn.edu/index.php/ reconsidering/article/view/2077
Dinh, K., Worth, H., & Haire, B. (2019). Buddhist evaluation: Applying a Buddhist world view to the Most Significant Change technique. Evaluation, 25(4), 477 – 495. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019841654
Eyben, R., Guijt, I., Roche, C., & Shutt, C. (Eds.). (2015). The politics of evidence and results in international development: Playing the game to change the rules? Practical Action.
Gaotlhobogwe, M., Major, T. E., Koloi-Keaikitse, S., & Chilisa, B. (2018). Conceptualizing evaluation in African contexts. New Directions for Evaluation, 159, 47 – 62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20332
Goldman, I., Byamugisha, A., Gounou, A., Smith, L. R., Ntakumba, S., Lubanga, T., . . . Rot-Munstermann, K. (2018). The emergence of government evaluation systems in Africa: The case of Benin, Uganda and South Africa. African Evaluation Journal, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.4102/aej.v6i1.253
G77. (2009, September 25). Ministerial declaration of the 33rd annual meeting of the ministers of foreign affairs of the member states of the group of 77 and China. http://www.g77.org/doc/Declaration2009.htm
Hall, B. L., & Tandon, R. (2017). Decolonisation of knowledge, epistemicide, participatory research and higher education. Research for All, 1(1), 6 – 19. https://doi.org/10.18546/rfa.01.1.02
Hickel, J. (2017). The divide: A brief guide to global inequality and its solutions. Penguin Random House.
Hickel, J. (2020). Quantifying national responsibility for climate breakdown: An equality-based attribution approach for carbon dioxide emissions in excess of the planetary boundary. The Lancet Planetary Health, 4(9), E399 – E404. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2542-5196(20)30196-0
Hickel, J., Sullivan, D., & Zoomkawala, H. (2021). Plunder in the post-colonial era: Quantifying drain from the Global South through unequal exchange, 1960–2018. New Political Economy. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2021.1899153
Husain, L. (2017). Policy experimentation and innovation as a response to complexity in China’s management of health reforms. Globalization and Health, 13 (1), Article No. 54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-017-0277-x. Medline:28774319
Jordan, L. S. (2015). Learning by doing: China-Africa co-operation and state learning: Policy insights 29. South African Institute of International Affairs.
Lent, J. R. (2017). The patterning instinct: A cultural history of humanity’s search for meaning. Prometheus Books.
Li , X. (2017). Should China join the GPEDC? The prospects for China and the Global Partnership for Effective Development Co-Operation. Discussion Paper 17/2017. German Development Institute.
Li , X. (2018). Filling the knowledge gap in South-South cooperation: An evaluation framework and its application in China-Tanzania cooperation. China Institute for South-South Cooperation in Agriculture, China Agricultural University. http://cissca.cau.edu.cn/module/download/downfile.jsp?classid=0&filename=f49794c88eea449a920880fcaa323b72.pdf
Li, X., Gu, J., Leistner, S., & Cabral, L. (2018). Perspectives on the Global Partnership for Effective Development Cooperation. IDS Bulletin, 49(3). https://doi.org/10.19088/19682018.153
Love, J. L. (1980). Raúl Prebisch and the origins of the doctrine of unequal exchange. Latin American Research Review, 15(3), 45 – 72. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2502991?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents
Mthembu, P. (2019). Towards BAPA+40: Challenges in defining South-South cooperation and development cooperation from Southern oowers. Network of Southern Think-Tanks, Africa Chapter.
Ndlovu-Gatsheni, S. J. (2018). The dynamics of epistemological decolonisation in the 21st century: Towards epistemic freedom. Strategic Review for Southern Africa, 40(1), 16 – 45. https://doi.org/10.35293/srsa.v40i1.268
OECD. (2018). OECD triangular cooperation toolkit. Author.
Ofir, Z., & Gallagher, L. (in press). The danger of the single story: Evaluation, ethics and the Global South. In R. D. Van den Berg, P. Hawkins , & N. Stame (Eds.), Ethics for evaluation. Taylor & Francis.
Patton, M. Q. (2018). Principles-focused evaluation: The GUIDE. Guilford Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2020). Evaluation criteria for evaluating transformation: Implications for the coronavirus pandemic and the global climate emergency. American Journal of Evaluation, 42(1), 53 – 89. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214020933689
Picciotto, R. (2020). From disenchantment to renewal. Evaluation, 26(1), 49 – 60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019897696
Pio, E., & Waddock, S. (2020). Invoking indigenous wisdom for management learning. Management Learning, 52(3), 328 – 346. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507620963956
Russon, C. (2014). Impact evaluation based on Buddhist principles. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 10(23), 73 – 77.
Russon, C., & Russon, K. (2010). How the I Ching or Book of Changes can inform Western notions of theory of change. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 6(13), 193 – 199.
Schwandt, T. A. (2009). Globalising influences on the Western evaluation imaginary. In K. E. Ryan & J. B. Cousins (Eds.), The SAGE international handbook of educational evaluation (pp. 19-36). SAGE.
Sibanda, A., & Ofir, Z. (2021). Evaluation in an uncertain world: A view from the Global South. In R. D. Van den Berg , C. Magro , & M.-H. Adrien (Eds.), Transformational evaluation for the global crises of our times (pp. 37-61 ). IDEAS .
South Commission. (1990). The challenge to the South: Report of the South Commission. Oxford University Press. https://www.southcentre.int/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/The-Challenge-to-the-South_EN.pdf
Terreblanche, S. (2014). Western empires, Christianity, and the inequalities between the West and the rest, 1500–2010. Penguin Books.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2019). Defining and quantifying South-South cooperation. https://unctad.org/webfl yer/defining-andquantifying-south-south-cooperation
United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2016). Accelerating sustainable development: South-South and triangular cooperation to achieve the SDGs: A UNDP strategy. https://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/development-impact/SS_TrC%20Docs/South-South-UNDP-Strategy-22Jul16_50yr_logo.pdf
United Nations General Assembly (UNGA). (2009, December). Nairobi outcome document of the high-level United Nations conference on South--South cooperation, sixty-fourth session, New York , A/64/L.37. https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/673444/files/A_64_L.37-EN.pdf
UNSG. (2017, August 7). State of South-South cooperation: Report of the secretary-general 2017. UN Doc. No. A/72/297, para. 2. https://undocs.org/A/72/297
UNSG. (2018, September). Report on the role of SSC and the implementation of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development: Challenges and opportunities. Seventy-Third Session, A/73/383. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/73/383&Lang=E
Waddock, S. (2020). Transforming towards life-centered economics: How business, government, and civil society can build a better world. Business Expert Press.
World Bank. (2020). China overview. https://www.worldbank.org/en/country/china/overview. Accessed January 11, 2021.
Yanka, D., Newman, P., Rauland, V., & Devereux, P. (2018). Sustainability in an emerging nation: The Bhutan case study. Sustainability, 10(5), 1622. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10051622
Yunkaporta, T. (2019). Sand talk: How indigenous thinking can save the world (1st ed.). Harper One.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Zenda Ofir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
