The Rights of Nature
An Emerging Transformation Opportunity for Evaluation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.71575Keywords:
environmental evaluation, institutional innovation, post-normal evaluation, Rights of Nature, transformationAbstract
“Building back better” in the post-COVID-19 Anthropocene era requires novel ideas and ways of working to truly challenge “business as usual” and contribute to urgently needed systems transformations. This article invites post-normal evaluation professionals to engage with the concept of the Rights of Nature, a generative form of institutional innovation that recognizes ecosystems and natural communities as entities that have an independent right to exist and flourish that can be enforced under legal or social norms. Pathways are suggested to use evaluation as values-driven practice to reflect on and encourage human-nature relationships founded on mutual dependence, cooperation, and synergy
References
Abson, D. J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U., . . . Lang, D. J. (2017). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio, 46(1), 30 – 39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y. Medline:27344324
Ansell, C., & Geyer, R. (2017). “Pragmatic complexity”: A new foundation for moving beyond “evidence-based policy making”? Policy Studies, 38(2), 149 – 167. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2016.1219033
ANZEA & SUPERU. (2015, June). Evaluation standards for Aotearoa New Zealand: For people commissioning, using, participating in, or conducting evaluations. https://www.anzea.org.nz/app/uploads/2019/04/ANZEA-Superu-Evaluation-standardsfinal-020415.pdf
Associated Press. (2016, January 7). Monkey selfie case: Judge rules animal cannot own his own photo copyright. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/jan/06/monkey-selfie-case-animal-photo-copyright
Avelino, F. (2017). Power in sustainability transitions: Analysing power and (dis)empowerment in transformative change towards sustainability. Environmental Policy and Governance, 27(6), 505 – 520. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1777
Bieluk, J. (2020). River as a legal person. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia, 29(2), 11-23. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.2.11-23
Boyd, D. R. (2011). The environmental rights revolution: A global study of constitutions, human rights, and the environment. University of British Columbia Press.
Burdon, P. (2010). The rights of nature: Reconsidered. Australian Humanities Review, 49. https://doi.org/10.22459/ahr.49.2010.04
Buschschlüter, V. (2020, November 30). Nemonte nenquimo: The Indigenous leader named environmental hero. BBC Latin America. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-latinamerica-55122550
Capra, F., & Mattei, U. (2015). The ecology of law: Toward a legal system in tune with nature and community (1st ed.). Berrett-Koehler.
Carter, B., & Harris, O. J. T. (2020). The end of normal politics: Assemblages, non-humans and international relations. In J. Pereira & A. Saramago (Eds.), Non-human nature in world politics: Frontiers in international relations (pp. 13-31). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49496-4_2
CELDF. (n.d.). Community environmental legal defense fund. https://celdf.org/advancingcommunity-rights/rights-of-nature/
Chapron, G., Epstein, Y., & López-Bao, J. V. (2019). A rights revolution for nature. Science, 363(6434), 1392 – 1393. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav5601. Medline:30872530
Chouinard, J. A. (2016). Introduction: Decolonizing international development evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 30(3), 237 – 247. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.30.3.01
Cram, F., Tibbetts, K. A., & LaFrance, J. (2018). Editors’ notes: A stepping stone in Indigenous evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2018(159), 7 – 16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20327
Deane, K. L., & Harré, N. (2016). Developing a thoughtful approach to evaluation: Values-driven guidelines for novice evaluators . Evaluation Matters—He Take Tō Te Aromatawai, 2, 53 – 78. https://doi.org/10.18296/em.0011
DEFRA. (2020). Complexity evaluation framework: Recognising complexity & key considerations for complexity-appropriate evaluation in the department for environment, food and rural affairs. Author. http://randd.defra.gov.uk/
De Vries-Stotijn, A., Van Ham, I., & Bastmeijer , K. (2019). Protection through property: From private to river-held rights. Water International, 44(6–7), 736 – 751. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2019.1641882
Dsouza, A. (2020, October 21). How to win legal rights for South Asia’s Rivers. International Rivers. https://www.internationalrivers.org/news/how-to-win-legal-rights-forsouth-asias-rivers/
Earth law Center. (n.d.). https://www.earthlawcenter.org/what-is-earth-law
Espinosa, C. (2019). Interpretive affinities: The constitutionalization of rights of nature, Pacha Mama, in Ecuador. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5), 608 – 622. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2015.1116379
Eyben, R., Guijt, I., Roche, C., & Shutt, C. (Eds.). (2015). The politics of evidence and results in international development: Playing the game to change the rules? Practical Action.
Feger, C., Mermet, L., Vira, B., Addison, P. F. E., Barker, R., Birkin, F., … Sutherland, W. J. (2019). Four priorities for new links between conservation science and accounting research. Conservation Biology, 33(4), 972 – 975. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13254. Medline:30456769.
Gallagher, L. , Kopainsky, B., Bassi, A. M., Betancourt, A., Buth, C., Chan, P., . . . Bréthaut, C. (2020). Supporting stakeholders to anticipate and respond to risks in a Mekong River water-energy-food nexus. Ecology and Society, 25 (4), art29. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-11919-250429
Gaotlhobogwe, M., Major, T. E., Koloi-Keaikitse, S., & Chilisa, B. (2018). Conceptualizing evaluation in African contexts. New Directions for Evaluation, 2018(159), 47 – 62. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20332
Gavin, M. C., McCarter, J., Berkes, F., Mead, A. T. P., Sterling, E. J., Tang, R., & Turner, N. J. (2018). Effective biodiversity conservation requires dynamic, pluralistic, partnership-based approaches . Sustainability, 10(6), 1846. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061846
Gerlak, A. K., Heikkila, T., & Newig, J. (2020). Learning in environmental governance: Opportunities for translating theory to practice. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(5), 1 – 14. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2020.1776100
GIZ. (2020). Transforming our work: Getting ready for transformational projects. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH. https://www.giz.de/fachexpertise/downloads/Transfomation%20Guidance_GIZ_02%202020.pdf
Global Alliance for the Rights of Nature (GARN). (n.d.). https://www.therightsofnature.org/frequently-asked-questions/
Hamilton, C., Gemenne, F., & Bonneuil, C. (2015). The Anthropocene and the global environmental crisis: Rethinking modernity in a new epoch. Taylor and Francis.
Hargrave, T. J., & Van de Ven, A. H. (2006). A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 864 – 888 . https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527458
Hickel, J., & Kallis, G. (2020). Is green growth possible? New Political Economy, 25(4), 469 – 486 . https://doi.org/10.1080/13563467.2019.1598964
Hindriks, F., & Guala, F. (2015). Institutions, rules, and equilibria: A unified theory. Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3), 459 – 480. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137414000496
Hodgson, G. M. (2015). On defining institutions: Rules versus equilibria . Journal of Institutional Economics, 11(3), 497 – 505. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137415000028
Hossain, N., Khurana, N., Mohmand, S. K., Nazneen, S., Oosterom, M., Roberts, T., . . . Schröder, P. (2018). What does closing civic space mean for development? A literature review and proposed conceptual framework. IDS Working Paper No. 515. https://opendocs.ids.ac.uk/opendocs/bitstream/handle/20.500.12413/13962/Wp515_Online.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
House, E. R. (1997). Evaluation in the government marketplace. Evaluation Practice, 18(1), 37 – 48. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821409701800104
House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. SAGE.
Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge.
IPBES. (2019). Summary for policymakers of the global assessment report on biodiversity and ecosystem services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. IPBES Secretariat . https://ipbes.net/sites/default/files/2020-02/ipbes_global_assessment_report_summary_for_policymakers_en.pdf
Jacobs, S., Zafra-Calvo, N., Gonzalez-Jimenez, D., Guibrunet, L., Benessaiah, K., Berghöfer, A., . . . Balvanera, P. (2020). Use your power for good: Plural valuation of nature: The Oaxaca statement. Global Sustainability, 3, e8 . https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.2
Kauffman, C. M., & Martin, P. L. (2018, April 4). When rivers have rights: Case comparisons of New Zealand, Colombia, and India. International Studies Association Annual Conference Proceedings, San Francisco. http://files.harmonywithnatureun.org/uploads/upload585.pdf
Khaskheli, J. (2020, September 30). Violations of river rights not letting Indus reach its delta: Experts. The International News. https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/722182violations-of-river-rights-not-letting-indus-reach-its-delta-experts
Kimmich, C., Gallagher, L., Kopainsky, B., Dubois, M., Sovann, C., Buth, C., & Bréthaut, C. (2019). Participatory modeling updates expectations for individuals and groups, catalyzing behavior change and collective action in water-energy-food nexus governance. Earth’s Future, 7(12), 1337 – 1352. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019ef001311
Kingston, C., & Caballero, G. (2009). Comparing theories of institutional change. Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(2), 151 – 180. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1744137409001283
Latulippe, N., & Klenk, N. (2020). Making room and moving over: Knowledge co-production, Indigenous knowledge sovereignty and the politics of global environmental change decision-making. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 7 – 14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.010
Leach, M., Rockström, J., Raskin, P., Scoones, I., Stirling, A. C., Smith, A., . . . Olsson , P. (2012). Transforming innovation for sustainability. Ecology and Society, 17(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-04933-170211
Lent, J. R. (2017). The patterning instinct: A cultural history of humanity’s search for meaning. Prometheus Books .
Lindenmayer, D. B., Piggott, M. P., & Wintle, B. A. (2013). Counting the books while the library burns: Why conservation monitoring programs need a plan for action. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(10), 549 – 555. https://doi.org/10.1890/120220
Mansaray, A.-B. S., & Aamodt, J. (2017). The Rights of Nature may improve water and sanitation in Sierra Leone. Sierra Leone Journal of Biomedical Research, 9(2), 8 – 12. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/sljbr/article/view/171628
Mertens, D. M. (2009). Transformative research and evaluation. Guilford Press.
Moore, S. J. , & Nesterova, Y. ( 2020 ). Indigenous knowledges and ways of knowing for a sustainable living. Paper commissioned for the UNESCO Futures of Education Report. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/344821411_Indigenous_knowledges_and_ways_of_knowing_for_a_sustainable_living
Mustonen, T., Feodoroff, P., with the Skolt Sámi Fishermen of Sevettijärvi. (2018). Skolt Sámi and atlantic salmon collaborative management of Näätämö Watershed, Finland as a case of Indigenous evaluation and knowledge in the Eurasian Arctic. New Directions for Evaluation, 2018(159), 107 – 119. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20334
Nalau, J., & Handmer, J. (2015). When is transformation a viable policy alternative? Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 349 – 356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.07.022
North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, institutional change, and economic performance. Cambridge University Press.
O’Brien , K. (2018). Is the 1.5°C target possible? Exploring the three spheres of transformation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 153 – 160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2018.04.010
O’Donnell, E. (2020). Legal rights for rivers: Competition, collaboration and water governance. Routledge.
OECD-DAC Network. (2019). Better criteria for better evaluation: Revised evaluation criteria, definitions and principles for use. OECD. https://search.oecd.org/dac/evaluation/revised-evaluation-criteria-dec-2019.pdf
Ostrom , E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press.
Pascual, U., Adams, W. M., Díaz, S., Lele, S., Mace, G. M., & Turnhout, E. (2021). Biodiversity and the challenge of pluralism. Nature Sustainability, 4, 567 – 572. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00694-7
Patton , M. Q. (2011). Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2019). Blue marble evaluation: Premises and principles. Guilford Press.
Pereira, L. M., Davies, K. K., den Belder, E., Ferrier, S., Karlsson -Vinkhuyzen, S., Kim , H., . . . Lundquist, C. J. (2020). Developing multiscale and integrative nature-people scenarios using the Nature Futures Framework. People and Nature, 2(4), 1172 – 1195. https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10146
Picciotto, R. (2020). From disenchantment to renewal. Evaluation, 26(1), 49 – 60. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019897696
Pickering, J., & Persson, Å. (2020). Democratising planetary boundaries: Experts, social values and deliberative risk evaluation in Earth system governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1), 59 – 71. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908x.2019.1661233
Pope Francis. (2015). Evangelium vitae [Encyclical letter]: On care for our common home. The Vatican. http://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html
Raffaelli, R. , & Glynn , M. A. ( 2015 ). Institutional Innovation: Novel, useful and legitimate. In C. E. Shalley, M. A. Hitt, & J. Zhou (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship (pp. 407-420). Oxford University Press .
Redford, K. H., Cook, C., Biggs, D., & Eoyang, G. (2020). Nature: Connecting well-being and conservation praxis. In B. A. Parsons, L. Dhillon, & M. Keene (Eds.), Visionary evaluation for a sustainable, equitable future (pp. 95 – 109). Information Age.
Reichert, P., Langhans, S. D., Lienert, J., & Schuwirth, N. (2015). The conceptual foundation of environmental decision support. Journal of Environmental Management, 154, 316 –332. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.01.053. Medline:25748599
Republic of Ecuador. (2008). Title II: Rights: Chapter seven: Rights of nature. Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador. https://therightsofnature.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/Rights-for-Nature-Articles-in-Ecuadors-Constitution.pdf
Richardson, B. J. (2008). The ties that bind: Indigenous peoples and environmental governance. In B. J. Richardson, S. Imai, & K. McNeil (Eds.), Indigenous peoples and the law: Comparative and critical perspectives (pp. 337-370). Hart Publishing.
Robinson, D. F., & Raven, M. (2020). Recognising Indigenous customary law of totemic plant species: Challenges and pathways. The Geographical Journal, 186(1), 31 – 44. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12320
Rosati, E. (2017). The Monkey selfie case and the concept of authorship: An EU perspective. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, 12(12), 973 – 977. https://doi.org/10.1093/jiplp/jpx199
Rowe, A. (2019). Sustainability-ready evaluation: A call to action. New Directions for Evaluation, 2019(162), 29 – 48. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20365
Rowe, A. (2021). Evaluation at the nexus: Evaluating sustainable development in the 2020s. In J. I. Uitto (Ed.), Evaluating environment in international development (2nd ed., pp. 46 – 60). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003094821-4
Sandbrook, C. (2015). What is conservation? Oryx, 49(4), 565 – 566. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605315000952
Sarkki, S., & Acosta García, N. (2019). Merging social equity and conservation goals in IPBES. Conservation Biology, 33(5), 1214 – 1218. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13297. Medline:30729586
Schoukens, H. (2019). Granting legal personhood to nature in the European Union: Contemplating a legal (r)evolution to avoid an ecological collapse? (Part II). Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 16(1), 65 – 90. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01601005
Schwandt, T. A. (2018). Evaluative thinking as a collaborative social practice: The case of boundary judgment making. New Directions for Evaluation, 2018(158), 125 – 137. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20318
Schwandt, T. A. (2019). Post-normal evaluation? Evaluation, 25(3), 317 – 329. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389019855501
Scoones, I. , Leach, M., & Newell, P. (2015). The politics of green transformations. In I. Scoones, M. Leach, & P. Newell (Eds.), The politics of green transformations (pp. 1 – 24). Routledge.
Stame, N. (2018). Strengthening the ethical expertise of evaluators. Evaluation, 24(4), 438 – 451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389018804942
Stirling, A. (2014). Emancipating transformations: From controlling “the transition” to culturing plural radical progress . In I. Scoones, M. Leach, & P. Newell (Eds.), The politics of green transformations (pp. 54 – 67). Routledge.
Stone, C. D. (1996). Should trees have standing? And other essays on law, morals and the environment. Oceana Publications.
Sword-Daniels, V., & Henderson, E. (2020). Learning to evaluate transformational change. https://www.itad.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Itad_TP_1_Transformational_Change.pdf
Toboso, F. (1995). Explaining the process of change taking place in legal rules and social norms: The cases of institutional economics and new institutional economics . European Journal of Law and Economics, 2(1), 63 – 84. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01540824
Uitto, J. I. (2021). Evaluating environment in international development. In J. I. Uitto (Ed.), Evaluating environment in international development (2nd ed. ; pp. 3-24). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003094821
Uitto, J. I., Puri , J., & van den Berg, R. D. (Eds.). (2017). Evaluating climate change action for sustainable development. Springer International.
Ulrich, W., & Reynolds, M. (2020). Critical systems heuristics: The idea and practice of boundary critique. In M. Reynolds & S. Holwell (Eds.), Systems approaches to making change: A practical guide (pp. 255 – 306). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-14471-7472-1_6
United Nations (UN). (2015a). The Paris agreement: United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. https://unfccc.int/files/essential_background/convention/application/pdf/english_paris_agreement.pdf
United Nations (UN). (2015b). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Resolution adopted by the UN General Assembly on 25 September 2015 (A/RES/70/1). https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2019). Environmental rule of law: First global report. https://www.unep.org/resources/assessment/environmental-rule-lawfirst-global-report
van den Berg, R. D., Magro, C., & Salinas Mulder, S. (Eds.). (2019). Evaluation for transformational change: Opportunities and challenges for the Sustainable Development Goals. International Development Evaluation Association (IDEAS). https://ideas-global.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/11/2019-11-05-Final_IDEAS_EvaluationForTransformationalChange.pdf
Vatn, A. (2005). Institutions and the environment. Edward Elgar.
Waapalaneexkweew (Nicole R. Bowman). ( 2018 ). Looking backward but moving forward: Honoring the sacred and asserting the sovereign in Indigenous evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 39(4), 543 – 568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018790412
Waddock, S. (2018). Narrative, memes, and the prospect of large systems change. Humanistic Management Journal, 3(1), 17 – 45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41463-018-0039-9
Wehipeihana, N., & McKegg, K. (2018). Values and culture in evaluative thinking: Insights from Aotearoa New Zealand. New Directions for Evaluation, 2018(158), 93 – 107. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20320
Wilson, G. (2017). Draft universal declaration of river rights. Earth Law Center. https://static1.squarespace.com/static/55914fd1e4b01fb0b851a814/t/59c5a79ba8b2b0dc3295a8af/1506125725815/Universal+Declaration+of+River+Rights+%28Draft%29_Sept+2017.pdf
Young, O. R. (2017). Beyond regulation: Innovative strategies for governing large complex systems . Sustainability, 9(6), 938. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060938
Yunkaporta, T. (2020). Sand talk: How Indigenous thinking can save the world. Text.
Zafra-Calvo, N., Balvanera, P., Pascual, U., Merçon, J., Martín-López, B., van Noordwijk, M., . . . Díaz, S. (2020). Plural valuation of nature for equity and sustainability: Insights from the Global South. Global Environmental Change, 63, 102115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2020.102115
Zazueta, A. E., & Garcia, J. R. (2021). Multiple actors and confounding factors. In J. I. Uitto (Ed.), Evaluating environment in international development (2nd ed., pp. 46 – 60). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/oa-edit/10.4324/978100309482
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Louise Gallagher, Zenda Ofir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
