Evaluation Advisory Groups

Considerations for Design and Management

Authors

  • Christopher Voegeli Independent Consultant
  • Margo Schmitt-Boshnick Aspen Research and Consulting, Red Deer, Alberta, Canada Red Deer Primary Care Network, Red Deer
  • Eugene Krupa Catalyst Research & Development Inc., Kelowna, British Columbia & University of Alberta, Alberta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.69949

Keywords:

advisory groups, advisory groups collaboration, collaboration evaluation, evaluation advisory

Abstract

An evaluation advisory group can be a vital resource, particularly for evaluations of collaboration-driven initiatives, but only if we effectively design the groups and engage their members. We discuss evaluation advisory groups using four themes: purposes, structures, processes, and pitfalls. Insights from a review and synthesis of the evaluation advisory group literature are integrated and illustrated with our own real-world experiences with evaluation advisory groups on a national and state/provincial scale, and in university and health system settings.

References

Baizerman, M. L., Fink, A., & VeLure Roholt, R. (2012). From consilium to advice: A review of the evaluation and related literature on advisory structures and processes. New Directions for Evaluation, 2012(136), 5 – 29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20031

Baizerman, M. L., VeLure Roholt, R., & Fink, A. (2014). Evaluation advisory groups. Research on Social Work Practice, 24(2), 186 – 187. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049731513485449

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Division of Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity. (2011). Developing and using an evaluation consultation group. Atlanta, GA. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/downloads/Evaluation-ConsultationGroup.pdf

Cohen, B. B. (2012). Advisory groups for evaluations in diverse cultural groups, communities, and contexts. New directions for evaluation, 2012(136), 49 – 65. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20033

Compton, D. W., & Baizerman, M. L. (2012). The evolution of a philosophy and practice of evaluation advice. New directions for evaluation, 2012(136), 67 – 76. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20034

Cousins, J. B., & Whitmore, E. (1998). Framing participatory evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 1998(80), 5 – 23. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.1114

Fetterman, D. M., Rodríguez-Campos, L., & Zukoski, A. P. (2018). Collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation: Stakeholder involvement approaches. Guilford Press.

Fetterman, D. M., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (2005). Empowerment evaluation principles in practice. Guilford Press.

Johnston-Goodstar, K. (2012). Decolonizing evaluation: The necessity of evaluation advisory groups in Indigenous evaluation. In R. VeLure Roholt & M. L. Baizerman (Eds.), Evaluation advisory groups. New Directions for Evaluation, 136, 109 – 117.

Mattessich, P. W. (2012). Advisory committees in contract and grant-funded evaluation projects. In R. VeLure Roholt & M. L. Baizerman (Eds.), Evaluation advisory groups. New Directions for Evaluation, 136, 31 – 48.

McLean, R. K. D., Finner, K., Dumaine, F., Graham, K., Mackie, J. E., Peckham, D., . . . Woodward, L. (2017). Finding balance: An evaluation governance model to ease tension between independence and inclusion. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.31124

Minkler, M., & Wallerstein, N. (2003). Community-based participatory research for health (pp. 5 – 24). Jossey-Bass.

Richards-Schuster, K. (2012). Empowering the voice of youth: The role of youth advisory councils in grant making focused on youth. New Directions for Evaluation, 2012(136), 87 – 100. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20036

Shulha, L. M., Whitmore, E., Cousins, J. B., Gilbert, N., & al Hudib, H. (2015). Introducing evidence-based principles to guide collaborative approaches to evaluation: Results of an empirical process. American Journal of Evaluation, 37(2), 193 – 215. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214015615230

VeLure Roholt, R. (2012). Advice giving in contested space. New Directions for Evaluation, 2012(136), 77-85.

VeLure Roholt, R., & Baizerman, M. L. (2012a). A model for evaluation advisory groups: Ethos, professional craft knowledge, practices, and skills. New Directions for Evaluation, 2012(136), 119 – 127. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20039

VeLure Roholt, R., & Baizerman, M. L. (2012b). Evaluation advisory groups. New Directions for Evaluation, 2012(136), 5–29. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20031

Downloads

Published

2023-04-21

How to Cite

Voegeli, C., Schmitt-Boshnick, M., & Krupa, E. (2023). Evaluation Advisory Groups: Considerations for Design and Management. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 36(2), 227–235. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.69949

Issue

Vol. 36 No. 2 (2021): Fall

Section

Research and Practice Notes

License

Copyright (c) 2021 Christopher Voegeli, Margo Schmitt-Boshnick, Eugene Krupa

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.

Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.