Praxis Makes Perfect? Transcending Textbooks to Learning Evaluation Experientially and in Cultural Contexts
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.69698Keywords:
anti-racist evaluation, BIPOC evaluators, culturally responsive evaluation, equity evaluation, evaluation praxis, evaluator professional development, Indigenous evaluationAbstract
The theory-to-practice loop is riddled with gaps, incongruencies, and, at times, trauma when it comes to the professional development and practice of evaluators. Our current system of professional development for evaluators systemically and institutionally reinforces racism, white privilege, and misogyny, thus re-creating harm and the barriers that so many BIPOC and LGBTQ2S evaluators are working hard to overcome. This article provides the reader with an alternative to the field’s valuing and learning evaluation within “institutions of higher education” and other “formal” and “scholarly” learning spaces. Rather, it provides for a balanced approach of experiential learning in the field and within cultural contexts as a much-needed professional design component for developing responsive, effective, and transformative evaluators. Praxis and experience should have at least equal value, merit, and worth for developing current and upcoming evaluators. When done correctly, wisdom to evaluative thinking, development, and practice happens, and not simply reinforcing and generating the same evaluative voices, constructs, and behaviours of the privileged evaluation patriarchy.
References
Alkin, M. C. (Ed.). (2012). Evaluation roots: A wider perspective of theorists’ views and influences. Sage.
American Evaluation Association (AEA). (2016). An evaluation roadmap for a more effective government. Author.
Bowman, N. R. (2018). Looking backward but moving forward: Honoring the sacred and asserting the sovereign in Indigenous evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 39(4), 543 – 568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018790412
Bowman, N. R., Dodge Francis, C., & Tyndall, M. (2015). Culturally responsive Indigenous evaluation: A practical approach for evaluating Indigenous projects in tribal reservation contexts. In S. Hood, R. Hopson, & H. Frierson (Eds.), Continuing the journey to reposition culture and cultural context in evaluation theory and practice (pp. 335 – 360). Information Age Publishing.
DiAngelo, R. (2018). White fragility: Why it’s so hard for white people to talk about racism. International Journal of Critical Pedagogy, 3(3), 54 – 70.
Dotson, K. (2014). Conceptualizing epistemic oppression. Social Epistemology, 28(2), 115 – 138 . https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2013.782585
Freire, P. (2002). Pedagogy of the oppressed (D. Macedo, Trans.). Continuum. (Original work published 1970).
Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic justice: Power and the ethics of knowing. Oxford University Press.
Gagnon, G. (2013). American Indian law: A discourse on chthonic law. North Dakota Law Review, 89(29), 29 – 51.
LaVelle, J. (2018). 2018 directory of evaluator education programs in the United States. University of Minnesota, Minnesota Evaluation Studies Institute. https://conservancy.umn.edu/bitstream/handle/11299/200790/Directory_full.pdf
LaVelle, J., Jones, N., & Donaldson, S. (2018). Grounding the imposter phenomenon in scholarly literature [paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the American Evaluation Association, Cleveland, OH.
Mattsson, M. , Johansson, I., & Sandström, B. (Eds.). (2008). Examining praxis: Assessment and knowledge construction in teacher education. Sense Publishers.
Newcomb, S. T. (2008). Pagans in the promised land: Decoding the doctrine of Christian discovery. Fulcrum Publishing.
Parkhurst, J. (2017). Th e politics of evidence: From evidence-based policy to the good governance of evidence. Routledge.
Patton, M. Q. (Ed.). (2017). Pedagogy of evaluation: New directions for evaluation (vol. 155 , pp. 9 – 16).
Shanker, V . (2019). Definitional tension: The construction of race in and through evaluation (Doctoral dissertation). University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy. http://hdl.handle.net/11299/211799
Shopes, L. (2007). Negotiating institutional review boards. American Historical Association Perspectives on History, 45(3). https://www.historians.org/publications-and-directories/perspectives-on-history/march-2007/negotiating-institutional-review-boards
United Nations Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IP-BES). (2019). Global assessment. http://ipbes.net/assessment-reports
Vo, A. T., & Archibald, T. (2018). New directions for evaluative thinking. Evaluative Thinking. New Directions for Evaluation, 158, 139 – 147. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20317
Vo, A. T., Schreiber, J. S., & Martin, A. (2018). Toward a conceptual understanding of evaluative thinking. Evaluative Thinking. New Directions for Evaluation, 158, 29 – 47. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20324
Waapalaneexkweew (Nicole R. Bowman-Farrell, Mohican/Lunaape). (2018). Looking backward but moving forward: Honoring the sacred and asserting the sovereign in Indigenous evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 39(4), 543 – 568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018790412
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Waapalaneexkweew Nicole Bowman
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
