Using People Styles for Interpersonal Competence
Encouraging Purposeful Reflection on Communication Behaviours
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.69576Keywords:
competency, evaluator training, interpersonal skills, people styles, reflective practiceAbstract
This article revitalizes the idea of “soft skills” as an important part of evaluator training by reflecting on use of the People Styles Assessment Inventory as a reflective exercise in a course with Master’s- and PhD-level evaluation and measurement students. It provides an overview of recent literature surrounding interpersonal competency in evaluation, highlighting the need for, and lack of emphasis on, interpersonal skills in evaluation training; presents the teaching-practice context for engaging in the People Styles assessment and reflective activity; describes the People Styles model; and reflects on use of the model for training future evaluation practitioners.
References
Bolton, R. (1989). People skills: How to assert yourself, listen to others, and resolve conflicts. Simon & Schuster.
Bolton, R., & Bolton, D. G. (2009). People styles at work and beyond (2nd ed.). Amacom.
Canadian Evaluation Society (CES). (2018). Competencies for Canadian evaluation practice. https://evaluationcanada.ca/txt/2_competencies_cdn_evaluation_practice.pdf
Dewey, J. D., Montrosse, B. E., Schroter, D. C., Sullins, C. D., & Mattox, J. R. (2008). Evaluator competencies: What’s taught versus what’s sought. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(3), 267 – 287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214008321152
Galport, N., & Azzam, T. (2016). Evaluator training needs and competencies: A gap analysis. American Journal of Evaluation, 38(1), 80 – 100. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214016643183
Hamington, M. (2018). Care, competency, and knowledge. In M. Visse & T. A. Abma (Eds.), Evaluation for a caring society. Information Age.
Krishnamurti, J. (1964). Think on these things. Harper & Row.
LaVelle, J. M., & Donaldson, S. I. (2015). The state of preparing evaluators. In J. W. Altschuld & M. Engle (Eds.), Accreditation, certification, and credentialing: Relevant concerns for U.S. evaluators. New Directions for Evaluation, 145, 39 – 52.
May, G. L., & Gueldenzoph, L. E. (2006). Th e effect of social style on peer evaluation ratings in project teams. Journal of Business Communication, 43(1), 4 – 20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021943605282368
Merrill, D. W., & Reid, R. H. (1981). Personal styles & effective performance. TRACOM Corporation.
Peters, J. M., & Armstrong, J. L. (1998). Collaborative learning: People laboring together to construct knowledge. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 79, 75 – 85.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Skolits, G. J., Morrow, J. A., & Burr, E. M. (2009). Reconceptualizing evaluator roles. American Journal of Evaluation, 30(3), 275 – 295. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214009338872
Smith, T. L., Barlow, P. B., Skolits, G. J., & Peters, J. M. (2015). Demystifying reflective practice: Using the DATA model to enhance evaluators’ professional activities. Evaluation and Program Planning, 52(2015), 142 – 147.
Smith, T. L., & Skolits, G. J. (in press). Conceptualizing and engaging in reflective practice: Experienced evaluators’ perspectives. American Journal of Evaluation.
Stevahn, L., King, J. A., Ghere, G., & Minnema, J. (2005). Establishing essential competencies for program evaluators. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(1), 43 – 59. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214004273180
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Tiffany Lee Smith
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
