Fieldwork Experience as Cultural Immersion
Two International Students and Their Professor Reflect on a Recent Evaluation Practicum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.70143Keywords:
cultural immersion, evaluation practicum, international students, reflective journal, teaching evaluationAbstract
In this practice note, two international students of evaluation reflect on the cultural challenges they experienced learning to apply Western-based methodologies in unfamiliar cultural contexts. Using a process of reflection, the students identify four interrelated challenges: understanding the culture and program setting, the need for interpersonal and communication skills, learning the language of evaluation, and telling the story. The paper concludes with reflections from the course professor, who highlights the challenges of teaching evaluation, an intensely cultural practice with deep roots in Western theoretical traditions, to students who do not come from the United States. Through reflective practice, the two students were able to overcome many of their initial challenges.
References
Austin, J. L. (1975). How to do things with words. Oxford University Press.
Bhola, H. S. (2003). Social and cultural contexts of educational evaluation: A global perspective. Kluwer.
Buitrago, C., Bhalla, S., Davidson, N., Davila, S., Hinojosa, A., Liberman, B., & Tosh, K. (2015). Learning for all: The value of field experiences in training a new generation of program evaluators. Harvard Family Research.
Carden, F., & Alkin, M. C. (2012). Evaluation roots: An international perspective. Journal of Multidisciplinary Evaluation, 8(17), 108 – 118.
Chouinard, J. A., Boyce, A. S., Hicks, J., Jones, J., Long, J., Pitts, R., & Stockdale, M. (2017). Navigating theory and practice through evaluation fieldwork: Experiences of novice evaluation practitioners. American Journal of Evaluation, 38(4), 493 – 506. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214016667582
Gredler, M. E., & Johnson, R. L. (2001). Lessons learned from the directed evaluation experience. American Journal of Evaluation, 22(1), 97 – 104. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(01)00115-1
Hopson, R. K. (2003). Overview of multicultural and culturally competent program evaluation: Issues, challenges and opportunities. Social Policy Research Associates. California Endowment.
Hurley, C., Renger, R., & Brunk, B. (2005). Learning from a challenging fieldwork evaluation experience: Perspectives of a student and an instructor. American Journal of Evaluation, 26(4), 562 – 578. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005281323
Mathison, S. (Ed.). (2005). Encyclopedia of evaluation. Sage.
Perry, K. M. (2008). A reaction to and mental metaevaluation of the experimental learning evaluation project. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(3), 352 – 357. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214008321686
Pon, G. (2009). Cultural competency as new racism: An ontology of forgetting. Journal of Progressive Human Services, 20(1), 59 – 71. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428230902871173
Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. Basic Books.
Searle, J. R. (1969). Speech acts: An essay in the philosophy of language. Cambridge University Press.
Smith, N. L. (2002). International students’ reflections on the cultural embeddedness of evaluation theory. American Journal of Evaluation, 23(4), 481 – 492. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1098-2140(02)00232-1
Smith, R. A., & Khawaja, N. G. (2011). A review of the acculturation experiences of international students. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 35(6), 699 – 713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijintrel.2011.08.004
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Grettel Mariana Arias Orozco, Onyinyechukwu Onwuka du Bruyn, Jill A. Chouinard

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.





