White Privilege and the Decolonization Work Needed in Evaluation to Support Indigenous Sovereignty and Self-Determination

Authors

  • Kate McKegg The Kinnect Group

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.67978

Keywords:

allies, colonization, evaluation, Indigenous, power, white privilege

Abstract

This paper builds on a keynote paper presented at the 2018 Canadian Evaluation Society annual conference by Kate McKegg, a Pākehā, non-Indigenous evaluator from Aotearoa, New Zealand. Kate reflects on the concept and implications for Indigenous people of white privilege in colonized Western nations. She discusses some of the ways in which white privilege and its consequences play out in the field of evaluation, perpetuating colonial sentiments and practices that maintain and reinforce inequities and injustice and potentially threaten the social justice aspirations of the field. Kate argues that those with white privilege have much work to do, unpacking and understanding their privilege if they are to have any chance of playing a role in deconstructing and dismantling the power structures that hold colonizing systems in place. She suggests that for evaluators to be effective allies for Indigenous sovereignty and self-determination, they must undertake ideological, cultural, emotional, and constitutional work. This work will be tough and scary and is not for the faint hearted. But it is vital to unlocking the potential transformation that can come from just and peaceful relationships that affirm and validate Indigenous peoples' ways of knowing and being.

References

Bell, A. (2014). Relating Māori and Pākehā: The politics of Indigenous and settler identities. Palmerston North, New Zealand: Massey University.

Berghan, G., Came, H., Coupe, N., Doole, C., Fay, J., McCreanor, T., & Simpson, T. (2017). Tiriti-based health promotion practice. Auckland, New Zealand: STIR.

Bishop, R. (2011). Freeing ourselves. Transgressions: Cultural Studies and Education, 66. Rotterdam, Netherlands: Sense Publishers.

Bishop, R. (2017). Relationships are fundamental to learning. Principal Connections, 20(3). Retrieved from http://cognitioneducation.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/Russell-Bishop-Editorial-for-CPCO.pdf

Blanchet-Cohen, N., Geoffroy, P., & Hoyos, L. M. (2018, October). Seeking culturally safe developmental evaluation: Supporting the shift in services for indigenous children. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 14 (31), 19–31.

Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. Los Angeles, CA: SAGE.

Cornell, S. (2006). Indigenous peoples, poverty and self-determination in Australia, New Zealand, Canada and the United States. JOPNA No. 2006-02. Retrieved from https://hpaied.org/sites/default/files/publications/Indigenous%20Peoples,%20Poverty%20and%20Self%20Determination%20in%20Australia,%20New%20Zealand,%20Canada%20and%20the%20US.pdf

Cram, F., & Phillips, H. (2012). Claiming interstitial space for multicultural, transdisciplinary research through community-up values. International Journal of Critical Indigenous Studies, 5 (2), 36–49. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcis.v5i2.89

Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York, NY: Herder & Herder. Hotere-Barnes, A. (2015). Generating “non-stupid optimism”: Addressing Pākehā paralysis in Māori educational research. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 50(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40841-015-0007-y

House, E. R., & Howe, K. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Hudson, M., Roberts, M., Smith, L., Tiakiwai, S.-J., & Hemi, M. (2012). The art of dialogue with Indigenous communities in the new biotechnology world. New Genetics and Society, 31 (1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/14636778.2011.597979

Huygens, I. (2011). Developing a decolonisation practice for settler colonisers: A case study from Aotearoa New Zealand. Settler Colonial Studies, 1(2), 53–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/2201473x.2011.10648812

Kirkhart, K. E. (2015). Unpacking the evaluator’s toolbox: Observations on evaluation, privilege, equity and justice. Evaluation Matters—He Hake Tō Te Aromatawai, 1 , 7–24. https://doi.org/10.18296/em.0002

Margaret, J. (2010). Working as allies: Winston Churchill fellowship report. Retrieved from http://www.awea.org.nz/sites/awea.org.nz/files/Jen%20Margaret%20Winston%20Churchill%20Report%202010.pdf

Margaret, J. (2013). Working as allies: Supporters of indigenous justice reflect. Auckland, New Zealand: Auckland Workers Educational Association.

Margaret, J. (2018). Ka pū te ruha, ka hao te rangatahi: Change in the Pākehā Nation . State of the Pākehā Nation. Retrieved from https://groundwork.org.nz/resources/

Masters-Awatere, B., & Nikora, L. W. (2017). Indigenous programmes and evaluation: An excluded worldview. Evaluation Matters—He Take Tō Te Aromatawai, 3, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.18296/em.0020

McIntosh, P. (1988). White privilege and male privilege: A personal account of coming to see correspondences through work in women’s studies. Working Paper No. 189. Wellesley, MA: Wellesley Centers for Women.

McKegg, K. (2013). Evaluation responsibility and leadership in the face of failing democracies. American Journal of Evaluation, 34(4), 579–582. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214013494458

Mertens, D. M. (2001). Inclusivity and transformation: Evaluation in 2010. American Journal of Evaluation, 22 (3), 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1098-2140(01)00150-3

Meyer, M. (2011). Holographic epistemology: Native common sense. Unpublished Paper.

Milne, A. (2009). Colouring in the white spaces: Cultural identity and learning in school. Auckland, New Zealand: APPA. Smith, L. T. (2005). On tricky ground, researching the native in the age of uncertainty. In N. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1–12). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Smith, L. T. (2012). Decolonising methodologies (2nd ed.). London, England: Zed Books.

Swiftwolfe, D., & Shaw, L. (n.d.). Indigenous ally toolkit. Montreal Indigenous Community Network. Retrieved from http://reseaumtlnetwork.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/Ally_web-2.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2Wbpz_SJ78lZg24nJEB0kY3I1s5sCaIx6GnJjwedvcB7vDjnOwie-wrMI

Waapalaneexkweew [N. Bowman-Farrell]. (2018). Looking backward but moving forward: Honoring the sacred and asserting the sovereign in Indigenous evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 39 (4), 543–568. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214018790412

Wehipeihana, N. (2008). Indigenous evaluation: A journey beyond participatory and collaborative approaches in evaluation. Presentation at the Australasian Evaluation Society Conference, Perth.

Wehipeihana, N., & McKegg, K. (2018). Values and culture in evaluative thinking: Insights from Aotearoa New Zealand. New Directions for Evaluation, 18(158), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/ev.20320

Downloads

Published

2019-04-21

How to Cite

McKegg, K. (2019). White Privilege and the Decolonization Work Needed in Evaluation to Support Indigenous Sovereignty and Self-Determination. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 34(2), 357–367. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.67978

Issue

Section

Theme Segment: CES Keynote Panel

Most read articles by the same author(s)