Finding Balance

An Evaluation Governance Model to Ease Tension between Independence and Inclusion

Authors

  • Robert K. D. McLean International Development Research Centre
  • Kaitlyn Finner International Development Research Centre
  • Lisa Woodward International Development Research Centre
  • François Dumaine PRA Inc.
  • Kathryn Graham Alberta Innovates
  • Jocelyn E. Mackie Grand Challenges Canada
  • David Peckham Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Kathryn Wehr Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.31124

Keywords:

evaluation governance, evaluation management, independence, oversight, participation

Abstract

Practitioners and theorists have documented the benefits of user engagement and participation in evaluation and, at the same time, the value of neutral and impartial evaluative evidence. Yet producing both an independent and inclusive evaluation is a leading challenge in our field. In this practice note, we present one solution. We describe the design of an evaluation governance structure that was used to find balance between these two themes. We also identify key elements of this experience and present these for adaptation by others, given appropriate tailoring. We have documented our experience as we believe that governance provides currently uncharted potential for this discipline spanning challenge.

Downloads

Published

2017-05-21

How to Cite

McLean, R. K. D., Finner, K., Woodward, L., Dumaine, F., Graham, K., Mackie, J. E., … Wehr, K. (2017). Finding Balance: An Evaluation Governance Model to Ease Tension between Independence and Inclusion. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 32(1), 109–121. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.31124

Issue

Section

Research and Practice Notes