Foundations for a Utopia
Can Evaluation Contribute to Achieving a Better World, and How?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2023-0026Keywords:
evaluation, planetary health, socio-ecological transition, sustainability, utopiaAbstract
“Considering that we have 10 years to radically transform our societies to make them sustainable and equitable, what would be the most important action that we should implement in our practice, as evaluators?” Nine experienced evaluators, representing a variety of practices, cultures, contexts, and genders, agreed to address this question. With this article, we explore how the evaluation field could help implement the foundations for achieving this utopia. After receiving the testimonies, a content analysis was conducted to identify the salient themes. The objective was not to find a consensus based on the suggestions but to create meaning from the different ideas. The draft analysis was shared with the participants, who were invited to become co-authors. Some voiced their skepticism on the capacity of the field to envision a new utopia. All indicated the need for evaluators to transcend the status quo mindset, emphasizing the importance of working with communities to increase their self-determination. One participant also raised the importance of contributing to larger social movements. The implications for the role of the evaluator are discussed.
References
Atleo, R. E. [Umeek]. (2011). Principles of Tsawalk: An Indigenous approach to global crisis. UBC Press.
Bremner, L. (2019). Creating new stories: The role of evaluation in truth and reconciliation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 34(2), 331–342.
Bremner, L., & Bowman, N. (2020). EvalIndigenous origin story: Effective practices within local contexts to inform practice and the field of evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 34(3), 425–441.
Bowman-Farrell, N. (2019). Nation-to-nation evaluation: Governance, tribal sovereignty, and systems thinking through culturally responsive Indigenous evaluations. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 34(2), 343–356.
Brousselle, A. (2024). Post-truth and pathways for evaluators. Evaluation, 30(4), 533–549.
Brousselle, A., & McDavid, J. (2020). Evaluators in the Anthropocene. Evaluation, 26(2), 190–204.
Brousselle, A., & McDavid, J. (2021). Evaluation for planetary health. Evaluation, 27(2), 168–183.
Brousselle, A., Curren, M., Dunbar, B., McDavid, J., Logtenberg, R., & Ney, T. (2024). Planetary health: Creating rapid impact assessment tools. Evaluation, 30(2), 269–287.
Brousselle, A., McDavid, J., Curren, M., Logtenberg, R., Dunbar, B., & Ney, T. (2022). A theory-based approach to designing interventions for Planetary Health, Evaluation 28(3), 330–355.
Chilisa, B., & Mertens, D. M. (2021). Indigenous Made in Africa evaluation frameworks: Addressing epistemic violence and contributing to social transformation. American Journal of Evaluation, 42(2), 241–253.
Chouinard, J. A., & Cram, F. (2020). Culturally responsive approaches to evaluation: Empirical implications for theory and practice. SAGE.
Claeys, G. (2022). Utopianism for a dying planet: Life after consumerism. Princeton University Press.
Contandriopoulos, C. (2013). Architecture and utopia in the 21st century. Journal of Architectural Education, 67(1), 3–6.
Cram, F. (2018). Conclusion: Lessons about Indigenous evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2018(159), 121–133.
Cram, F., Tibbetts, K. A., & LaFrance. J. (2018). Editors’ notes: A stepping stone in Indigenous evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2018(159), 7–16.
Davidson, D. J. (2010). The applicability of the concept of resilience to social systems: Some sources of optimism and nagging doubts. Society & Natural Resources, 23, 1135–1149.
de Geus, M. (1999). Ecological Utopias: Envisioning the sustainable society. International Books.
Evans J., Bremner L. K., Johnston A. L. K., Rowe G., Sasakamoose JL. (2020) Exploring Indigenous Approaches to Evaluation and Research in the Context of Victim Services and Supports. Summary by J. Evans. Papers Submitted to the Department of Justice Canada by L. K. Bremner, A. L.K. Johnston, G. Rowe, JL Sasakamoose, Department of Justice Canada/ Ministères de la Justice Canada (last accessed online on Feb 28, 2023): https://www.justice.gc.ca/eng/rp-pr/jr/eiaer-eaame/docs/rsd_rr2020-indigenous-approaches-to-evaluation-and-research-eng.pdf
Ewuoso, C., & Hall, S. (2019). Core aspects of ubuntu: A systematic review. South African Journal of Bioethics and Law, 12(2), 93–103.
Fazey, I., Moug, P., Allen, S., Beckmann, K., Blackwood, D., Bonaventura, M., Burnett, K., Danson, M., Falconer, R., Gagnon, A. S., Harkness, R., Hodgson, A., Holm, L., Irvine, K. N., Low, R., Lyon, C., Moss, A., Moran, C., Naylor, L., … Wolstenholme, R. (2018). Transformation in a changing climate: A research agenda. Climate and Development, 10(3), 197–217.
Forss, K. (2018). Getting value for money? A critical analysis of the costs and benefits of evaluation. In J.-E. Furubo & N. Stame (Eds.), The evaluation enterprise: A critical view (pp. 179–197). Routledge.
Furubo, J.-E. (2018). Understanding the evaluation enterprise. In J.-E. Furubo & N. Stame (Eds.), The evaluation enterprise: A critical view (pp. 3–31). Routledge.
Gaotlhobogwe, M., Major, T. E., Koloi‐Keaikitse, S., & Chilisa, B. (2018). Conceptualizing evaluation in African contexts. New Directions for Evaluation, 2018(159), 47–62.
Greene, J. (1997). Evaluation as advocacy. Evaluation Practice, 18(1), 25–35.
Greene, J. (2001). Dialogue in evaluation: A relational perspective. Evaluation, 7(2), 181–187.
House, E. R. (2020). Evaluating in a fragmented society. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 16(36), 26–36.
House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1998). The issue of advocacy in evaluations. American Journal of Evaluation, 19(2), 233–236.
House, E. R., & Howe, K. R. (1999). Values in evaluation and social research. SAGE.
info@haidanation.com (2021). Because gina ‘waadluxan gud ad kwaagid everything depends on everything else: A summary of Haida Gwaii Marine Protected Areas Virtual Open House. Published online Feb 4, 2021. Retrieved from https://www.haidanation.ca/because-gina-waadluxan-gud-ad-kwaagid-everything-depends-on-everything-else-a-summary-of-haida-gwaii-marine-protected-areas-virtual-open-house/
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Summary for policymakers. In Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1–34).
Kingsnorth, P., & Hine, D. (2009). The Dark Mountain manifesto. Retrieved from https://dark-mountain.net/about/manifesto/
Kirkhart, K. E. (2010). Eyes on the prize: Multicultural validity and evaluation theory. American Journal of Evaluation, 31(3), 400–413.
Kumar, K. (1991). Utopianism. Open University Press.
Marquardt, J., & Lederer, M. (2022). Politicizing climate change in times of populism: An introduction. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 735–754.
Marquardt, J., Oliveira, C. M., & Lederer, M. (2022). Same, same but different? How democratically elected right-wing populists shape climate change policymaking. Environmental Politics, 31(5), 777–800.
McIntyre, L. (2018). Post truth. MIT Press. Retrieved from https://mitpress.mit.edu/9780262535045/
Morin, E. (2022). Réveillons-nous! Editions Denoël.
Munaretto, S., Siciliano, G., & Turvani, M. E. (2014). Integrating adaptive governance and participatory multicriteria methods: A framework for climate adaptation governance. Ecology and Society, 19(2), 74.
Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. (2011). Merchants of doubt: How a handful of scientists obscured the truth on issues from tobacco smoke to global warming. Bloomsbury.
Ostrom, E. (2007, February 15–19). Sustainable Social-Ecological Systems: An Impossibility? [Paper presentation]. Annual Meetings of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, “Science and Technology for Sustainable Well-Being,” San Francisco, CA, United States.
Patton, M. Q. (2021). Evaluation ethics in desperate times. In R. D. van den Berg, P. Hawkins, & N. Stame (Eds.), Ethics for evaluation: Beyond “doing no harm” to “tackling bad” and “doing good” (1st ed.). Routledge.
Pepper, D. (2005). Utopianism and environmentalism. Environmental Politics, 14, 3–22.
Perrin, B. (2018). Accountability’s two solitudes and the questions it raises. Accountability to whom? By whom? And for what? In J.-E. Furubo & N. Stame (Eds.), The evaluation enterprise: A critical view (pp. 126–158). Routledge.
Redvers, N., Celidwen, Y, Schultz, C., Horn, O., Githaiga, C., Vera, M., Perdrisat, M., Plume, L. M., Kobei, D., Cunningham Kain, M., Poelina, A., Nelson Rojas, J., & Blondin, B. (2022). The determinants of planetary health: An Indigenous consensus perspective. The Lancet Planetary Health, 6(2), E156–E163.
Rowe, A. (2022). Evaluation at the endgame: Evaluating sustainability and the SDGs by moving past dominion and institutional capture. In J. I. Uitto & G. Batra (Eds.), Transformational change for people and the planet: Evaluating environment and development (pp. 207–221). Springer.
Schmelzer, M., Vetter, A., & Vansintjan, A (2022). The future is degrowth: A guide to a world beyond capitalism. Verso.
Stame, N. (2018). The politics/administration dichotomy and evaluation. In J.-E. Furubo & N. Stame (Eds.), The evaluation enterprise: A critical view (pp. 32–57). Routledge.
Stame, N. (2022). Program, complexity, and system when evaluating sustainable development. Evaluation, 28(1), 58–71.
Taylor, K. (2018). Utopianism. In The concise Oxford dictionary of politics and international relations (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
United Nations General Assembly Economic and Social Council. (2023). Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals: Towards a rescue plan for people and planet. Retrieved from https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/files/report/2023/secretary-general-sdg-report-2023--EN.pdf
van den Berg, R. D. (2011). Evaluation in the context of global public goods. Evaluation: The International Journal of Theory, Research and Practice, 17(4), 405–415.
van den Berg, R., & Cando-Noordhuizen, L. (2017). Action on climate change: What does it mean and where does it lead to? In J. I. Uitto, J. Puri, & R. van den Berg (Eds.), Evaluating climate change action for sustainable development (pp. 13–34). SpringerOpen.
Webb, D. (2008). Exploring the relationship between hope and utopia: Towards a conceptual framework. Politics, 28(3), 197–206.
Wehipeihana, N. (2019). Increasing cultural competence in support of Indigenous-led evaluation: A necessary step toward Indigenous-led evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation / La Revue canadienne d’évaluation de programme, 34(2), 368–384.
Weiss, C. H. (1987). Where politics and evaluation research meet. In D. Palumbo (Ed.), The politics of program evaluation (pp. 47–70). SAGE.
Whitmee, S., Haines, A., Beyrer, C., et al. (2015). Safeguarding human health in the Anthropocene epoch: Report of the Rockefeller Foundation-Lancet Commission on planetary health. The Lancet, 386(10007), 1973–2028.
Wilkinson, H., Hills, D., & Barbrook-Johnson, P. (2021). Building a system-based Theory of Change using Participatory Systems Mapping. Evaluation, 27(1). Advance online publication.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Astrid Brouselle, Larry Bremner, Kiri Parata, Abu Ala Hasan, Weronika Felcis, Andrealisa Belzer, Nonvignon Marius Kêdoté, Rituu B. Nanda, Lynda Olivia Rey, Ligia Maria Vieira-da-Silva
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
