Developing a Community of Practice (CoP) on Monitoring, Evaluation, and Learning (MEL) in a Global Network of Women’s Funds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2023-0005Keywords:
communities of practice, evaluation capacity building, feminist evaluation, global evaluation, organizational learningAbstract
This paper provides a structured description and analysis of the development and implementation of a community of practice (CoP) framework for monitoring, evaluation, and learning (MEL) within women’s funds (WF) around the world, particularly members of the Prospera International Network of Women’s Funds (Prospera-INWF). The Prospera-INWF is the global hub of women’s funds that advocates for resource justice within philanthropy. It supports its 44 members in strengthening institutional capacity that is critical for women’s funds to be resilient and transform the world for women, girls, trans, intersex, and non-binary people and their communities. Co-authors are three members of the Prospera-INWF Secretariat Team, one representative of a multi-regional fund, and two technical consultants who were involved in the CoP development process. Considerations for how feminist principles strengthened the design and implementation of the CoP are discussed. Emergent key learnings of applying feminist principles to develop a CoP that focuses on feminist MEL practice are detailed, including CoPs as a critical, transformative methodology (and not merely a technical strategy). While learnings are gleaned through the specific Prospera-INWF CoP, they may provide useful insights for researchers and practitioners of MEL, adult learning, and evaluation capacity building (ECB), particularly those aiming to engage feminist principles in their work.
Fadekemi Akinfaderin and Leah C. Neubauer are co-first authors of this work.
References
Ahmad, N. (2021). Feminist approaches to monitoring, evaluation and learning. In Sport, Gender and Development: Intersections, Innovations and Future Trajectories (pp. 191–209). Emerald Publishing Limited.
Angeles, L. C. (2011). Feminist demands, dilemmas, and dreams in introducing participatory action research in a Canada-Vietnam capacity-building project. In G. Creese & W. Frisby (Eds.), Feminist community research: Case studies and methodologies (pp. 37–57). Vancouver, BC: The UBC Press.
Batliwala, S., & Pittman, A. (2010). Capturing change in women’s realities. Toronto, ON: Association for Women’s Rights in Development (AWID). www.awid.org/sites/default/files/atoms/files/capturing_change_in_womens_realities.pdf
Bourgeois, I., Lemire, S. T., Fierro, L. A., Castleman, A. M., & Cho, M. (2023). Laying a solid foundation for the next generation of evaluation capacity building: Findings from an integrative review. American Journal of Evaluation, 44(1), 29–49.
Bowman, K., & Sweetman, C. (2014). Introduction to gender, monitoring, evaluation and learning. Gender & Development, 22(2), 201–212.
Brisolara, S., Seigart, D., & SenGupta, S. (Eds.). (2014). Feminist evaluation and research: Theory and practice. New York, NY: Guilford.
Browne, P. (2022). Interrogating leadership paradigms using a public sector lens: Creating horizontal leadership spaces for inclusive and transformative monitoring, evaluation and learning (MEL) practice. Johannesburg: Twende Mbele. https://coilink.org/20.500.12592/mhj6jw
Cabria, A. (2013) Feminist evaluation and women’s funds. Prospera International Network of Women’s Funds (INWF).
Chang, P., & Ramdas, K. (2005). Giving globally: International perspectives. In E. Clift (Ed.), Women, philanthropy, and social change: Visions for a just society (pp. 172–182). University Press of New England.
Christie, C. A., & Klein, B. M. (2009). Developing a community of practice: Learning and transformation through evaluation. In K. E. Ryan & J. B. Cousins (Eds.), The SAGE International Handbook of Educational Evaluation (pp. 357–374).
Eade, D. (2007). Capacity building: Who builds whose capacity?. Development in Practice, 17(4/5), 630–639. www.jstor.org/stable/25548262
English, L. M., & Irving, C. J. (2015). Feminism in community: Adult education for transformation. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Garcia, M., Kee, C., Arnold, M., Oliva, M. C., Losey, L. (2024). Communities of practice: Learning spaces for integrating experiential knowledge, intersectionality, and innovative approaches that promote culturally responsive and equitable evaluation. In A. C. Adedoyin, N. N. Amutah-Onukagha, & C. D. Jones (Eds.), Culturally responsive and equitable evaluation: Visions and voices of emerging scholars (pp. 98–109). San Diego, CA: Cognella.
Hardlife, Z., & Zhou, G. (1997). Utilisation of monitoring and evaluation systems by development agencies: The case of the UNDP in Zimbabwe. Methodology, 1997(64).
Kaplan, A. (2000). Capacity building: Shifting the paradigms of practice. Development in Practice, 10(3/4), 517–526.
Lesser, E., & Everest, K. (2001). Using communities of practice to manage intellectual capital-improving an organization’s use of knowledge assets. Ivey Business Journal, 65(4), 37–43.
Meessen, B., Kouanda, S., Musango, L., Richard, F., Ridde, V., & Soucat, A. (2011). Communities of practice: The missing link for knowledge management on implementation issues in low-income countries? Tropical Medicine & International Health, 16(8), 1007–1014.
Murray, U. (2005). Promoting gender-sensitive entrepreneurship via microfinance institutions. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Gender and Population Division.
Neubauer, L. C. (2016, August 29). Labor Day week: Leah C. Neubauer on honoring Tom Chapel. AEA 365. https://aea365.org/blog/labor-day-week-leah-c-neubauer-on-honoring-tom-chapel/
Neubauer, L. C., McBride, D., Guajardo, A. D., Casillas, W. D., & Hall, M. E. (2020). Examining issues facing communities of color today: The role of evaluation to incite change. New Directions for Evaluation, 2020(166), 7–11.
Ojok, R. R. (2018). What makes a good monitoring, evaluation and learning system? https://taicollaborative.org/what-makes-a-good-monitoring-evaluation-and-learning-system
Patton, M. Q. (1998). Discovering process use. Evaluation, 4(2), 225–233.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Feminist, yes, but is it evaluation? New Directions for Evaluation, 2002(96), 97–108.
Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Ploumen, L. (2001). Mama Cash: Investing in the future of women. Gender & Development, 9(1), 53–59.
Podems, D. R. (2010). Feminist evaluation and gender approaches: There’s a difference. Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation, 6(14), 1–17.
Preskill, H., & Boyle, S. (2008). A multidisciplinary model of evaluation capacity building. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(4), 443–459.
Probst, G., & Borzillo, S. (2008). Why communities of practice succeed and why they fail. European Management Journal, 26(5), 335–347.
Rahn-Tiemeyer, K. (2015). Understanding dimensions of advocacy success: How evaluation can maximize the impact of nonprofit advocacy initiatives. SPNHA Review, 11(1), 5. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/spnhareview/vol11/iss1/5
Sielbeck-Bowen, K. A., Brisolara, S., Seigart, D., Tischler, C., & Whitmore, E. (2002). Exploring feminist evaluation: The ground from which we rise. New Directions for Evaluation, 2002(96), 3–8.
Symonette, H. (2009). Cultivating self as responsive instrument: Working the boundaries and borderlands for ethical border crossings. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Research Ethics (pp. 279–294). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Tovey, T. L. S., & Skolits, G. J. (2022). Conceptualizing and engaging in reflective practice: Experienced evaluators’ perspectives. American Journal of Evaluation, 43(1), 5–25.
Wenger, E. C., McDermott, R. A., & Snyder, W. M. (2002). Cultivating communities of practice: A guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Wenger, E. C., & Snyder, W. M. (2000). Communities of practice: The organizational frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78(1), 139–145.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fadekemi Akinfaderin, Leah C. Neubauer, Pei Yao Chen, Augusta Hagen Dillon, Alexandra Garita, Sherry Makleff
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
