Theory-of-Change Visuals
Using Diagrams, Metaphors, and Symbols to Communicate Complex Ideas and Get Buy-In
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2024-0028Keywords:
facilitation, frameworks, metaphors, symbols, visualsAbstract
Everyone can imagine a situation in which they have put in countless hours of work on a new measurement and evaluation framework and, when it is time to get feedback or present their ideas, they have been met with 1,000-yard stares. Conventional approaches can sometimes struggle to engage stakeholders and convey complex concepts. To address this, authors of this article propose a unique, visually based approach that integrates metaphors and symbols into measurement and evaluation frameworks with goals of getting buy-in, portraying complexity, and making evaluation fun for everyone. Termed theory-of-change visualizations, this methodology emphasizes effective communication and facilitation—two key skills authors argue every evaluator should have. The authors advocate for the use of metaphors and symbols that resonate with stakeholders’ experiences and contexts to anchor frameworks in relatable imagery (such as nature-based symbols or culturally significant metaphors). Illustrated through diverse case studies and practical examples, the approach’s usefulness is demonstrated across various contexts, including in both small and large programs with varied outcomes and dynamics. Insights into selecting appropriate metaphors are provided, considering factors such as program characteristics, local context, and audience preferences. Additionally, potential limitations and challenges, including the requisite time, resources, and stakeholder buy-in, are acknowledged and addressed. Integrating visuals portraying metaphors or symbols into frameworks offers a promising avenue for enhancing engagement, understanding, and buy-in for evaluation. By embracing creativity and inclusivity in evaluation practices, this approach can help navigate the complexities of program evaluation for those not in the field while, at the same time, fostering meaningful dialogue and decision-making.
References
Byington, C. C. (2023, 10 October). Quick and dirty (really dirty) guide to bison: Keystone species edition. Cool Green Science: Stores of the Nature Conservancy. https://blog.nature.org/2023/10/10/quick-and-dirty-guide-bison-keystone-species/
Comi, A., & Eppler, M.J. (2011). Assessing the impact of visual facilitation on inter-organizational collaboration: An experimental study. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 17(10), 1430–145.
Department of Conservation. (n.d.). Predator Free 2050. New Zealand Government. Retrieved July 23, 2024, from https://www.doc.govt.nz/nature/pests-and-threats/predator-free-2050/
Eppler, M. J., Öste, H. F., & Bresciani, S. (2013, July). An experimental evaluation on the impact of visual facilitation modes on idea generation in teams. In 2013 17th International Conference on Information Visualisation (pp. 339–344). IEEE.
Espiner, D., & Hartnett, F. (2016). Innovation and graphic facilitation. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 28(4), 44–53.
Gardiner, K. (2023, June 3). How Canadian bison have been brought back from the brink in Saskatchewan. National Geographic. https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/article/canadian-bison-brought-back-saskatchewan
Hautopp, H., & Ørngreen, R. (2024). From training to practice: Long-term perspectives of graphic facilitation used in organisations. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 43(2–3), 145–162.
Keane-Tuala, Kelly. (2015, 17 February). Ngā manu – birds– Tohu – signs and predications. Te Ara – The Encyclopedia of New Zealand. https://www.TeAra.govt.nz/en/nga-manu-birds/page-3.
Lewontin, R. C. (2001). In the beginning was the word. Science, 291(5007), 1263–1264.
Margulies, N., & Sibbet, D. (2009). Visual recording and graphic facilitation: Helping people see what they mean. In The change handbook: The definitive resource on today’s best methods for engaging whole systems, easy read super large 24pt edition (p. 366). Berret-Koehler Publishers.
Patton, M. Q. (2010). Developmental Evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. Guilford Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2018). Principles-focused evaluation—The GUIDE. Guilford Press.
Two Bridges Consulting. (2022, 22 February). Oranga Programme – Values based measurement (Kauri and Tohorā metaphors) [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/CifP6kY0Ndg
Wingspan Birds of Prey Trust. (n.d.). Ruru (morepork) in Maori mythology. Retrieved June 20, 2024, from https://www.wingspan.co.nz/maori_mythology_and_the_ruru_morepork.html
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Simon Lambert, Micheal Heimlick, Mariella Marzano, Melanie Mark-Shadbolt, Valance Smithion

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.





