Old Knowledge, New Tools
Applying an Indigenous Approach to Social Network Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe-2024-0034Keywords:
Indigenous evaluation, Indigenous methods, methods, social network analysis, story maps, strength-based evaluationAbstract
Program work with American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) communities necessitates Indigenous approaches and methods for evaluation. AI/AN researchers are working to reclaim evaluation as a traditional value and identify methods that fit into existing Indigenous evaluation frameworks. However, an increased understanding of how to utilize data collection tools appropriately and how they fit within these Indigenous frameworks is still needed. In this article, the author describes the process, rationale, and reflections on using a social network analysis tool while grounded in Indigenous evaluation principles. We discuss how displaying the results using a GIS story map can tell the story of a community of practice of Indigenous plants and foods educators. This article addresses the Southern Door—Be of Good Mind—as it describes a method that centres on community, honors relationships, and focuses on resiliency. By presenting the results through a GIS story map, the data can be gifted back to the communities and connect the relationships on a spatial scale to honour the inseparable connections between Indigenous plants and foods work and the land on which it takes place.
References
Blanchet, K., & James, P. (2012). How to do (or not to do) … a social network analysis in health systems research. Health Policy and Planning, 27(5), 438–446.
Bowman, N. (2005, October 26–29). Government to government evaluation: Issues and strategies for conducting evaluation with Tribal governments [Paper presentation]. Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Boyd, S. (2005, November 18). What knowledge do you privilege [Paper presentation]. University of Victoria Graduate Student Conference for Studies in Policy and Practice. Victoria, BC, Canada.
Bremner, L. (2019). Creating new stories: The role of evaluation in truth and reconciliation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 34(2), 331–342.
Carrington, P. J., & Scott, J. (2011). The SAGE Handbook of Social Network Analysis. Sage.
Cross, T. L., Friesen, B. J., Jivanjee, P., Gowen, L. K., Bandurraga, A., Matthew, C., & Maher, N. (2011). Defining youth success using culturally appropriate community-based participatory research methods. Best Practices in Mental Health, 7(1), 94–114.
Davies, R., & Dart, J. (2005). The ‘most significant change’ (MSC) technique. A guide to its use, 10.
Degenne, A., & Forsé, M.(1999). Introducing social networks. Sage.
Esri Story Map Apps. (2013, Summer). What can you do with a story map? Esri. https://www.esri.com/about/newsroom/arcuser/what-can-you-do-with-a-story-map/
Greenwood, M., & Lindsay, N. M. (2019). A commentary on land, health, and Indigenous knowledge (s). Global Health Promotion, 26(Suppl. 3), 82–86.
Harding, A., Harper, B., Stone, D., O’Neill, C., Berger, P., Harris, S., & Donatuto, J. (2012). Conducting research with tribal communities: Sovereignty, ethics, and data-sharing issues. Environmental Health Perspectives, 120(1), 6–10.
Huang, L. N., Hepburn, M. S., & Espiritu, R. C. (2003). To be or not to be evidence-based. Data Matters, 6, 1–3.
Kovach, M. (2009). Indigenous methodologies: Characteristics, conversations, and contexts. University of Toronto Press.
Kovach, M. (2020). Conversation method in Indigenous research. First Peoples Child & Family Review, 5(1), 40–48.
LaFrance, J. (2004). Culturally competent evaluation in Indian country. New Directions for Evaluation, 2004(102), 39–50.
LaFrance, J., & Nichols, R. (2008). Reframing evaluation: Defining an Indigenous evaluation framework. The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 23(2), 13.
LaFrance, J., Nichols, R., & Kirkhart, K. E. (2012). Culture writes the script: On the centrality of context in indigenous evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation, 2012(135), 59–74.
Locklear, S., Hesketh, M., Begay, N., Brixey, J., Echo-Hawk, A., & James, R. (2023). Reclaiming our narratives: An Indigenous evaluation framework for urban American Indian/Alaska Native communities. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 38(1), 8–26.
Secaira, M. (2019, 31 May). Abigail Echo-Hawk on the art and science of ‘decolonizing data’. CrossCut. https://crosscut.com/2019/05/abigail-echo-hawk-art-and-science-decolonizing-data
Urban Indian Health Institute. (2022). Native Plants & Foods Story Map. ArcGIS Online. Retrieved December 27, 2024, from https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/6aae22b2a7bf4e2b876adfee6565f3e2
Waapalaneexkweew (Nicole R. Bowman-Farrell, Mohican/Lunaape). (2018). Looking backward but moving forward: Honoring the sacred and asserting the sovereign in indigenous evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation, 39(4), 543–568.
Wang, C., & Burris, M. A. (1997). Photovoice: Concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior, 24(3), 369–387.
Wehipeihana, N. (2019). Increasing cultural competence in support of Indigenous-led evaluation: A necessary step toward Indigenous-led evaluation. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 34(2), 368–384.
Wehipeihana, N., McKegg, K., Thompson, V., & Pipi, K. (2016). Cultural responsiveness through developmental evaluation: Indigenous innovations in sport and traditional Maori recreation. In M. Q. Patton, K. McKegg, & N. Wehipeihana (Eds.), Developmental Evaluation Exemplars: Principles and Practice (pp. 25–44). Guilford Press.
Wilson, S. (2001). What is an Indigenous research methodology? Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25(2), 175–179.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Martell Hesketh
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
