Faudrait-il établir le modèle d‘évaluation avant, pendant ou après l‘évaluation d'un programme?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.6.002Abstract
An experimental evaluation of the sexology program was conducted at the University of Quebec at Montreal. Managers of the program, students, teachers, individuals and groups directly or indirectly involved in sexology took part in the evaluation. This article deals with the evaluation model inspired by Hammond, Stake and Tyler. Questions raised at the outset by the institution about the objectives of all its baccalaureate programs and program managers' concerns about meeting the needs of future work situations led to the emergence of this model. Other circumstances did not support the model. The final application of the model is presented. Questions are raised about the fate in program evaluation of models modified during the evaluation process.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 1991 Louise Gaudreau
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors contributing to The Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation agree to release their articles under the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0 (CC-BY-NC) license. This licence allows this work to be copied, distributed, remixed, transformed, and built upon for any purpose provided that appropriate attribution is given, a link is provided to the license, and changes made were indicated.
Authors retain copyright of their work and grant the journal right of first publication.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
