Assessing the Quality of Aboriginal Program Evaluations

Authors

  • Steve Jacob Université Laval
  • Geoffroy Desautels Université Laval

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.29.1.62

Keywords:

Aboriginal evaluation, evaluation standards, evaluative norms, meta-evaluation, quality of evaluation

Abstract

Evaluations have gained in popularity in Canada since the 1990s, but statistical data indicate that the resources allocated to this management tool have not increased accordingly, despite the increased demand. During the same period, regardless of significant efforts to optimize governance, the Canadian federal government's management of issues related to Aboriginal peoples presents some weaknesses. Because evaluation may directly affect the administration of public programs, this study proposes a meta-evaluation of First Nations program evaluations. To do so, we replicate a methodology previously used by the Treasury Board Secretariat in 2004 to complete a vast study assessing the quality of evaluation in Canada. This article, based on the systematic analysis of a nonprobability sampling of more than 20 program evaluation reports, has applied the TBS's meta-evaluation techniques to the Aboriginal context. The results show that the evaluation of Aboriginal programs is of good, and even excellent, quality and suggest that the TBS's evaluation policy has had a definitive impact on evaluation quality.

Downloads

Published

2021-04-21

How to Cite

Jacob, S., & Desautels, G. (2021). Assessing the Quality of Aboriginal Program Evaluations. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation, 29(1), 62–86. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjpe.29.1.62

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)